Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Footprints Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Human Services$40kYouth Development$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kAnimals$7kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$5kHousing & Shelter$5kPhilanthropy$2k
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,039
Median grant
2
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT C$6,000
UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY$2,039
BONNIE BRAE$1,000
THE OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%THE OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $14k → 12%THE OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $300 → 12%ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT C: $10k → 4%ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT C: $6k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39k · 4 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$39k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-11%

Still filing today

100%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $16k · revenue +57%
  • OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $14k · revenue +112%
  • TB
    TRI-STATE BASSET HOUND RESCUE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HI
    Heartworks Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • KC
    K Collentine
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • PA
    PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridges Nj Inc

When a family is in crisis, Bridges is there to offer support by providing respite and host homes for children in our community. Children visit respite homes for several hours after school or on weekends to enjoy the benefit of a nurturing…

Human Services
2
Bridge Home No Kill Animal Rescue

To provide a no kill shelter in order to rescue and find homes for displaced animals

Animals
3
Almost Home Dog Rescue of Nj Inc

The mission of almost home dog rescue of nj is to care for and place abandoned and abused dogs into caring homes.

4
United Way of Hudson County

The united way of hudson county is a non-profit community resource with the sole mission to do whatever we can to help the poor, the sick, the elderly, the disabled and the homeless people of hudson county.

Philanthropy
5
Pathways Inc

Empowering women and children on their path out of homelessness through hospitality, housing, and hope.

Human Services
6
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
7
Rouse-Brokenstraw Associates Corporation

Housing for low-income elderly tenants.

8
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey

Compassionately serving in community so that all are free to choose abundant life.

Human Services
9
The Bridge Fund of New York Inc

The prevention of homelessness. the bridge fund offers clients at risk of homelessness a combination of financial assistance through interest free loans or grants and financial counseling.

Human Services
10
Home Care Options Inc

To serve the expanding and evolving in-home needs of residents of northern nj by delivering a continuum of care for clients and families through the services of a highly trained caring and compassionate workforce.

Human Services
11
Bridge Communities Inc

The mission of bridge communities is to transition homeless families to self-sufficiency by working with partners to provide mentoring, housing, and supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
12
Baypath Humane Society of Hopkinton Inc

Baypath humane society of hopkinton connects people and animals to build a compassionate community. we provide shelter, care, and enrichment to animals in need, help them find loving homes, and promote well-being through outreach,…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis - a Haven for Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is House of Puddles Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION — $16,000 · Human ServicesROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATIONOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $14,300 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INCBRIDGES OUTREACH INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OUTREACH INCBONNIE BRAE — $2,500 · Human ServicesBONNIE BRAEK Collentine — $5,000 · OtherK CollentineM Rodriguez — $5,000 · OtherM RodriguezB Daignault — $3,300 · OtherB DaignaultH Freeland-Frey — $2,500 · OtherH Freeland-FreyC Hickman — $1,203 · OtherC HickmanM Hernandez — $1,100 · OtherM HernandezG Lindo — $800 · Other+2 more — $900 · OtherHeartworks Inc — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentHeartworks IncTRI-STATE BASSET HOUND RESCUE — $6,000 · AnimalsHouse of Puddles Inc — $1,000 · AnimalsPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC — $5,000 · EducationNOURISHNJ INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $2,039 · Philanthropy
Human Services$37,800Other$19,803Youth Development$15,000Animals$7,000Education$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$2,039

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHeartworks Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $14,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-STATE BASSET HOUND RESCUE — $6,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBONNIE BRAE — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $2,039 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Puddles Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Footprints Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • Nourishnj Inc27% of income from government
  • United Way of Broward County Inc27% of income from government
  • Bridges Outreach Inc25% of income from government
  • Bonnie Brae3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph