· Private foundation
The Foley Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $462k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY | $1,500,000 |
| WEST POINT'S MICHIE STADIUM PRESERVATION | $1,050,000 |
| THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ONLY ONE | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SONOMA MARIN | $100,000 |
| ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE | $75,000 |
| SONOMA COUNTY GRAPE GROWERS FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| CORAZON HEALDSBURG | $75,000 |
| NAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION | $53,193 |
| NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK | $51,600 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CA DAVIS | $50,000 |
| TRUE WEST FILM CENTER | $50,000 |
| SONOMA COUNTY VINTNERS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SONOMA MARIN | $50,000 |
| TRUE WEST FILM CENTER | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +67% · 28% of their budget
- CACATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC7× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +156% · 54% of their budget
- VGVEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +1% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- NVNAPA VALLEY GRAPEGROWERS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2.1M · revenue +165%
ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2.1M · revenue +40%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $1.9M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
Valley health foundation (vhf) is a non-profit leader in community health and healthcare that fundraises to support, innovate, and advocate for better health for all in santa clara county. vhf helps patients, families, and dedicated…
Our mission is to protect local nature and farmland to ensure a healthy environment for everyone.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Napa Valley and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY GRAPEGROWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTY VINTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALPINE THEATRE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ONLY ONE INC ↗
- Who funds POWELL COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds INJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERS AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds Eco Defense Group ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds TRUE WEST FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER RENO COMMUNITY ICE SKATING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AHIVOY ↗
- Who funds Sonoma County Grape Growers Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTRY ↗
- Who funds HEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · The Angora Ridge Foundation · Roundup for Safety Inc · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Foley Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ahivoy — 29% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Dbwpc Inc — 10% of income from government
- Tuality Healthcare — 4% of income from government
- Tuality Healthcare Foundation — 3% of income from government
- Cathedral Arts Project Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Foley Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Foley Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.