Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Finkelstein Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$76kHuman Services$55kHealth$35kEducation$34kHousing & Shelter$30kRecreation & Sports$24kFood & Nutrition$19kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODLEY HOUSE INC$11,000
THE BRISCOE CENTER FOR AMERICAN HISTORY$5,000
SEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC$5,000
PMC COHAN SHAPIRO HELLMAN$3,750
HARRY RANSOM CENTER$3,000
LEARNING UNDEFEATED INC$2,500
MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC$2,000
GEORGE H W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY & MUSEUM$2,000
GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION$2,000
THE LIBRARY COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA$1,000
WILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEARING$1,000
YELLOW BOOMERANG INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
DC CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $2k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 16%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 31 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
27

Total granted

$250k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+18%

Still filing today

58%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODLEY HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +43%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +49%
  • SI
    SOME INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • JJ
    JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -62%
  • TG
    The George Washington Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +30%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
Wonders Early Learning Extended Day

To create and advance high quality, diverse educational communities that teach children the foundations of life-long learning and social responsibility.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dc Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $21,000 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INCSOME INC: $17,800 · OtherSOME INCHARRY RANSOM CENTER: $16,200 · OtherHARRY RANSOM CENTERTHE BRISCOE CENTER FOR AMERICAN HISTORY: $16,000 · OtherTHE BRISCOE CENTER FOR AMERICAN HISTORYBRISCOE CENTER FOR AMER HISTORY: $12,000 · OtherBRISCOE CENTER FOR AMER HISTORYGEORGE H W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY & MUSEUM: $8,000 · OtherSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherTHE KENNEDY CENTER: $6,000 · Other+35 more: $52,239 · Other+35 moreWOODLEY HOUSE INC: $28,550 · HealthWOODLEY HOUSE INCSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC: $14,000 · HealthSEVEN ACRES JEWISH…CHILDREN'S WISH GROUP OF RHODE ISLAND: $2,500 · Health+4 more: $2,500 · HealthIMAGINATION STAGE INC: $14,500 · Arts & CultureIMAGINATION…JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $12,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENN…Houston Grand Opera Association Inc: $4,200 · Arts & CultureHouston Gra…HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Kinkaid School Inc: $9,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $6,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 · EducationLearning Undefeated Inc: $14,454 · Community ImprovementMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $7,000 · Environment
Other$162,239Health$47,550Arts & Culture$30,700Recreation & Sports$17,000Education$17,000Community Improvement$14,454Environment$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODLEY HOUSE INC: $28,550 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $17,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINATION STAGE INC: $14,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLearning Undefeated Inc: $14,454 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe George Washington University: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING: $4,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Grand Opera Association Inc: $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S WISH GROUP OF RHODE ISLAND: $2,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LIBRARY COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY MEALS AND MORE: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER RISING: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODLEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINATION STAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Learning Undefeated Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC ↗
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Park Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING ↗
  • Who funds Houston Grand Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S WISH GROUP OF RHODE ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Finkelstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Finkelstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Imagination Stage Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Finkelstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Finkelstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Finkelstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph