· Private foundation
The Evelyn & Paul Robinson Family Fdn CO Whittemore Dowen & Ricciardelli LLP
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of The Evelyn & Paul Robinson Family Fdn CO Whittemore Dowen & Ricciardelli LLP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The King's School | $20,000 |
| God's World Publication Inc | $17,000 |
| Redeemer Baptist Church | $10,000 |
| New Life Maternity Inc | $10,000 |
| Columbia-Greene Humane Society | $10,000 |
| The Ben Osborn Memorial Fund | $7,500 |
| Rabbit Room Inc | $6,000 |
| One Mission Society USA | $6,000 |
| Samaritan's Purse | $5,000 |
| Dive Savannah Foundation Inc | $2,500 |
| Adirondack Comm College Fdn | $2,400 |
| Eastminster Presbyterian Church | $2,000 |
| Canine Companions for Indep | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GWGod's World Publications Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +69%
- TRTHE RABBIT ROOM5× · 2021–2025 · $44k · revenue +117%
- CHCOLUMBIA-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY INC4× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- CUCAIRN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +5%
- SMSt Mary's-St Alphonsus Regionalone grant, 2022 · $25k
- HHHARTFORD HISTORICAL GROUPone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to provide various levels of necessary short term and long-term care that are typically characteristic of the aging process.
We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…
The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…
This healthcare hospitality house provides a "home away from home" accomodations to patients and families of patients who are receiving medical care in central new york.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
To educate the public in the prevention of cruelty to animals and provide shelter and medical care for homeless animals as well as assist in finding permanent homes for these animals.
It is the mission of the corporation to promote the creation and maintenance of services and institutions for people with care needs. this mission is founded on the belief that prudent use of resources for compassionate services is a…
The mission of st. patrick's home as a charitable, non-profit organization is to provide care and services to the community in conformance with the theology, philosophy, teachings and doctrines of the roman catholic church, respecting and…
To meet the health care needs of elderly persons and other individuals who require chronic health care by establishing and maintaining a chronic care management program, including but not limited to: management and coordination of…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Double H Hole in the Woods Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Conkling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAIRN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds God's World Publications Inc ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS ASSOCIATION FT BLIND ↗
- Who funds THE RABBIT ROOM ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONKLING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds VALATIE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK VETS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GHENT FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL OF BREVARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE MATERNITY INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMALKIND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Rheinstrom Hill Community Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Evelyn & Paul Robinson Family Fdn CO Whittemore Dowen & Ricciardelli LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Services Council of Brevard County Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.