Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mitsubishi Electric America Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
288
Grants FY2025still arriving
25
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Employment$2.5MEducation$2.0MHealth$1.6MHuman Services$405kArts & Culture$389kYouth Development$361kFood & Nutrition$326kPhilanthropy$280kOther$0
02FY2025 · 288 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k240 grants · $273k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $627k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $1.1M
$1,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE STAR RECYCLERS$60,000
GROWING TOGETHER AQUAPONICS INC$60,000
FIRST$60,000
TACT$60,000
BUTLER TECHNOLOGY AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT SCHOOLS$52,500
KINNEY CENTER FOR AUTISM AT ST JOSEPH'S$52,500
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
CAST INC$50,000
CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION$50,000
KINNEY CENTER FOR AUTISM AT ST JOSEPH'S$50,000
BUTLER TECHNOLOGY AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT SCHOOLS$50,000
CELEBRATE EDU$50,000
EXCEPTIONAL MINDS$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $4k → 13%PIVOT OK: $3k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY: $3k → 21%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $6k → 9%SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL LAKE COUNTY: $5k → 8%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER INC: $4k → 11%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $6k → 15%CAST INC: $50k → 10%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $3k → 13%SPERO VINEYARDS INC: $30k → 11%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY: $3k → 21%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $4k → 9%SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL LAKE COUNTY: $3k → 8%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF BUFFALO TRACE: $4k → 20%CAST INC: $25k → 10%SPERO VINEYARDS INC: $30k → 11%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $3k → 9%SPERO VINEYARDS INC: $10k → 11%SPERO VINEYARDS INC: $10k → 11%CORE CAREER: $50k → 9%BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK: $70k → 8%CORE CAREER: $25k → 9%BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK: $50k → 8%CORE CAREER: $20k → 9%ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $31k → 14%ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $30k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $50k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $50k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $35k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $32k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $4k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $3k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $3k → 14%ASPIRITECH NFP: $71k → 14%ASPIRITECH NFP: $25k → 14%SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL LAKE COUNTY: $4k → 8%ASPIRITECH NFP: $25k → 14%SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL LAKE COUNTY: $3k → 8%ASPIRITECH NFP: $25k → 14%ASPIRITECH NFP: $25k → 14%ASPIRITECH NFP: $20k → 14%ASPIRITECH NFP: $10k → 14%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 218 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

218 repeat relationships — 131 still active in FY2025, 87 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

218
185

Total granted

$7.8M
$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+6%

Still filing today

73%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $551k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BLUE STAR RECYCLERS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $562k · revenue +52%
  • TU
    The Uniquely Abled Project
    5× · 2021–2025 · $425k · revenue +49% · 65% of their budget
  • PS
    PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
    5× · 2019–2024 · $336k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • HF
    HIVES FOR HEROES
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue ×313
  • DP
    DREAM PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +2%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES
    one grant, 2019 · $61k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
3
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
4
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
5
The National Fragile X Foundation

The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.

Health
6
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
7
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
8
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
9
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
10
Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc

Easter seals massachusetts is a statewide community-based organization that has been helping people with disabilities to live full and independent lives for over 75 years. our mission is to provide services to ensure that children and…

Health
11
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
12
Easter Seals Florida Inc

See schedule o for a complete description of the organization's mission

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gifted Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Mentoring ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Dance Arts OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportSchool Parent OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterPregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsAddiction Recovery ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Cancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersYouth Development ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesDevelopmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/388
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,177

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

355 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 355 of the 461 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
346/355
Grantees still filing
216/355
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLUE STAR RECYCLERS — $561,930 · OtherBLUE STAR RECYCLERSGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC — $380,895 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INCBUTLER TECHNOLOGY AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT SCHOOLS — $302,500 · OtherBUTLER TECHNOLOGY AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT SCHOOLSCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $221,500 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERTACT — $210,000 · OtherFIRST — $200,000 · OtherPARTNERS FOR YOUTH WITH DISABILITIES INC — $187,000 · OtherBUTLER TECH FOUNDATION — $185,000 · OtherLIFE'SWORK OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $146,815 · OtherDISABILITY EMPOWHER NETWORK INC — $138,750 · OtherCONSERVATION LEGACY — $193,900 · Other+86 more — $1,247,557 · Other+86 moreThe Uniquely Abled Project — $425,127 · EducationThe Uniquely Abled Pro…PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $336,000 · EducationPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE…SPARKFORCE — $248,000 · EducationSPARKFORCEGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY — $185,000 · EducationGALLAUDET UNIVERSITYDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $167,185 · EducationDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEAR…Vanderbilt University — $99,015 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityDREAM PARTNERSHIP — $75,000 · Education+16 more — $167,361 · Education+16 moreEXCEPTIONAL MINDS — $202,271 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL M…ASPIRITECH NFP — $200,000 · Human ServicesASPIRITECH NF…Bridges from School to Work Inc — $120,000 · Human ServicesBridges from …CORE CAREER — $95,456 · Human ServicesCORE CAREERSPERO VINEYARDS INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesSPERO VINEYAR…CAST INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesCAST INCTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES — $61,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF TH…+23 more — $172,111 · Human Services+23 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $100,000 · HealthChildren's…Banner Health Foundation — $100,000 · HealthBanner Hea…ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthELS FOR AU…WESTCHESTER INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT — $100,000 · HealthWESTCHESTE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,712 · HealthST JUDE CH…RACING FOR HEROES INC — $59,900 · HealthRACING FOR…ALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO — $53,157 · HealthALS UNITED…ALS UNITED GREATER SAN DIEGO — $29,332 · Health+24 more — $192,030 · Health+24 moreEaster Seals Tristate — $235,657 · EmploymentGROWING TOGETHER AQUAPONICS INC — $220,000 · EmploymentCELEBRATE EDU — $99,000 · EmploymentMINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC — $60,000 · Employment+1 more — $3,000 · EmploymentDREAMS FOR SCHOOLS — $202,200 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $120,000 · Arts & CultureVERMONT FOLKLIFE CENTER — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $18,150 · Arts & CultureSCIENCE BUDDIES — $235,000 · PhilanthropyPEAK GRANTMAKING INC — $20,500 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $9,847 · Philanthropy+4 more — $15,360 · Philanthropy
Other$3,975,847Education$1,702,688Human Services$1,005,838Health$815,131Employment$617,657Arts & Culture$365,350Philanthropy$280,707

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUE STAR RECYCLERS — $561,930 over 6y, 11% of budgetThe Uniquely Abled Project — $425,127 over 5y, 65% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $336,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPARKFORCE — $248,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetEaster Seals Tristate — $235,657 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSCIENCE BUDDIES — $235,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetGROWING TOGETHER AQUAPONICS INC — $220,000 over 3y, 65% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL MINDS — $202,271 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetDREAMS FOR SCHOOLS — $202,200 over 3y, 10% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP — $200,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $193,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS FOR YOUTH WITH DISABILITIES INC — $187,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY — $185,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $167,185 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLIFE'SWORK OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $146,815 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetDISABILITY EMPOWHER NETWORK INC — $138,750 over 3y, 16% of budgetBridges from School to Work Inc — $120,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $120,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWESTCHESTER INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University — $99,015 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORE CAREER — $95,456 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $81,515 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,712 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPERO VINEYARDS INC — $80,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetNATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND — $75,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM PARTNERSHIP — $75,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES — $61,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRACING FOR HEROES INC — $59,900 over 2y, 13% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO — $53,157 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFeeding America — $43,551 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO VALLEY VOICES — $38,410 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS INCLUDED TOGETHER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVERMONT FOLKLIFE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL LAKE COU — $23,394 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEAK GRANTMAKING INC — $20,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION (ACTE) — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISLANDS OF BRILLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $19,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation — $18,918 over 6y, 0.5% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $18,439 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC — $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF PLYMOUTH INC — $16,937 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $16,905 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Jackson Emc Foundatio…The United Way of Sou…The Scott Hudgens Fam…Community Foundation …The Primerica Foundat…Walton Electric Trust…Arbella Insurance Fou…United Way of Greater…Snee-Reinhardt Charit…North Easton Savings …Massey Charitable Tru…The Imlay Foundation …
Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy RouseGA29.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · The Primerica Foundation Inc · Walton Electric Trust Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Massey Charitable Trust · The Imlay Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mitsubishi Electric America Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Vermont Folklife Center — 90% of income from government
  • New Hope Inc — 73% of income from government
  • TransCen Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Cast Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Riverview School Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 461 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home