· Private foundation
The Emma and Georgina Bloomberg Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $142k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $940k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $873k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC | $1,000,000 |
| DOGS TRUST USA INC | $100,000 |
| OUR BIG FAT CARIBBEAN RESCUE INC | $100,000 |
| ONLY ONE INC | $100,000 |
| APRILES MEMORIAL FRENCH BULLDOGS SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT SERVICES | $98,360 |
| ANIMAL NATION INC | $75,000 |
| THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| LEADERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL EQUITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE SATO PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| OCEAN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| KIPP FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC | $50,000 |
| FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS | $50,000 |
| BARKY PINES ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY INC | $50,000 |
| WOMEN IN NEED INC | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $780k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $357k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER4× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +30%
ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +95%- DTDOGS TRUST USA INC5× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +99% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- ACANIMAL CARE CENTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INCone grant, 2019 · $50k
- AFALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue 0%
- AFALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE - READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
Friends for animal rescue ny, inc. is a nonprofit organization that furthers the interest of animals in the new york state area and improves their quality of life by supporting medical care, enrichment activities, training and…
The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.
The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
Animal rescues. pet adoption center. shelter cruelty victims. farm animals. wildlife refuge. spay/neuter. humane education. youth work. grief counseling. human health via pets.
We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds DOGS TRUST USA INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL NATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SATO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
- Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEE FOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ONLY ONE INC ↗
- Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds HAMPTON CLASSIC HORSE SHOW INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds BARKY PINES ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE 19TH NEWS ↗
- Who funds Our Big Fat Caribbean Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds APRILE MEMORIAL FRENCH BULLDOGS SPEC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC ↗
- Who funds PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH REGIMENT ARMORY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
- Who funds CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Riggio Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Jewish Communal Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Emma and Georgina Bloomberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mane Stream Inc — 1% of income from government
- People for Animals Inc — 1% of income from government
- The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.