Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Emil J & Marie D Kochton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$367kEducation$338kHuman Services$280kReligion$109kArts & Culture$39kEnvironment$34kAnimals$22kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $177k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$618k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLNESS HOUSE$20,000
KIDS ABOVE ALL$20,000
ST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
INVISIBLE WOUNDS FOUNDATION$15,000
THE MORTON ARBORETUM$12,000
AID FOR WOMEN$10,000
JOSEPHINUM HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$10,000
BENET ACADEMY$10,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST$10,000
US CONSTITUTION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$10,000
NAZARETHVILLE RETIREMENT HOME$5,000
SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 24 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$1.4M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    Wellness House
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +63%
  • AF
    AID FOR WOMEN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $92k · revenue +126%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIT BULL RESCUE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -40%
  • BD
    BEACH DOG RESCUE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
4
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
5
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
6
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance

Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…

Animals
7
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
8
Shelter Animals Count

To create, share and steward the national database of sheltered animals that provides facts and enables insights to save lives.

Animals
9
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
10
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
11
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
12
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Above All Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Beach Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATION — $180,000 · OtherST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATIONAID FOR WOMEN INC — $92,000 · OtherAID FOR WOMEN INCJOSEPHINUM HIGH SCHOOL — $90,000 · OtherJOSEPHINUM HIGH SCHOOLMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS — $90,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLSASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST — $81,050 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WESTMARIANJOY FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherMARIANJOY FOUNDATIONBENET ACADEMY — $53,000 · OtherNAZARETHVILLE RETIREMENT HOME — $50,000 · OtherKids Above All Illinois — $47,000 · OtherSISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY — $45,000 · Other+9 more — $75,150 · Other+9 moreWellness House — $180,000 · HealthWellness HouseInvisible Wounds Foundation — $15,000 · HealthInvisible Wound…The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $60,000 · ReligionTHE LIRA ENSEMBLE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of Chicago — $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MORTON ARBORETUM — $34,000 · EnvironmentTHE US CONSTITUTION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationMILOS SANCTUARY INC — $4,500 · AnimalsCAT ALLIANCE TEAM SANCTUARY — $4,500 · AnimalsSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIT BULL RESCUE — $2,000 · AnimalsBEACH DOG RESCUE — $2,000 · AnimalsPOLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$1,043,200Health$195,000Religion$60,000Arts & Culture$39,000Environment$34,000Education$15,000Animals$13,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWellness House — $180,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC — $92,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST — $81,050 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetKids Above All Illinois — $47,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM — $34,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIRA ENSEMBLE — $30,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTeach Democracy — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE US CONSTITUTION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetInvisible Wounds Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILOS SANCTUARY INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAT ALLIANCE TEAM SANCTUARY — $4,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIT BULL RESCUE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBEACH DOG RESCUE — $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPOLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wellness House
  • Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation)
  • Who funds Kids Above All Illinois
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM
  • Who funds THE LIRA ENSEMBLE
  • Who funds Teach Democracy
  • Who funds THE US CONSTITUTION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Invisible Wounds Foundation
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago
  • Who funds MILOS SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds CAT ALLIANCE TEAM SANCTUARY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIT BULL RESCUE
  • Who funds BEACH DOG RESCUE
  • Who funds POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Emil J & Marie D Kochton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Emil J & Marie D Kochton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Emil J & Marie D Kochton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph