Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Emerald Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$42kArts & Culture$14kRecreation & Sports$12kInternational$11kPhilanthropy$9kHuman Services$8kEnvironment$8kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$217k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION$2,000
GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY$1,549
MAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES INC$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,057
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE GREAT LAKES$1,030
SANIBEL CAPITVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$1,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
CLEVELAND METROPARKS$1,000
NOTES FOR MOTHER INC$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
CONNECT TO A CAUSE$1,000
PELOTONIA$518
Individual grant recipient$500
HOMER ELEMENTARY PTO$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CELEBRATE BIRTHDAYS INC: $1k → 13%EMPOWER SPORTS: $2k → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $2k → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $2k → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $500 → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $500 → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $500 → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 18 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
26

Total granted

$87k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+48%

Still filing today

67%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • ES
    EMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • CT
    CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -10%
  • PI
    PRESQUE ISLE COMMUNITY DEVEL ASSO
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • LE
    LCJVS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
2
Adult Congenital Heart Association

To empower the congenital heart disease (chd) community by advancing access to resources and specialized care that improve patient-centered outcomes.

Health
3
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
6
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
7
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
8
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
9
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health
10
Ascentria Care Alliance Inc

We are called to strengthen communities by empowering people to respond to life's challenges.

Human Services
11
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
12
Heart of Florida United Way Inc

The mission of heart of florida united way is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our communities. this is accomplished by standing up for the health, education, and financial stability of every person in central florida.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clean the World Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Homer Elementary Pto Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE GREAT LAKES: $14,040 · OtherNATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE GREAT LAKESAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $6,300 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $5,598 · OtherGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INCDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $5,000 · OtherDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST OHIOIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherPRESQUE ISLE COMMUNITY DEVEL ASSO: $2,500 · OtherLCJVS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Other+26 more: $28,238 · Other+26 moreHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · HealthHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOC…American Heart Association Inc: $4,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Asso…THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FOU…DOWN SYNDROME DIAGNOSIS NETWORK: $2,000 · HealthDOWN SYNDROME DIAGN…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC: $3,425 · InternationalCLEAN THE …PELOTONIA: $4,053 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationHOMER ELEMENTARY PTO INC: $1,000 · EducationEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION: $6,500 · Human ServicesCELEBRATE BIRTHDAYS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY: $4,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MERIDEN & WALLINGFORD INC: $400 · Philanthropy
Other$67,676Health$21,000International$11,425Education$8,553Human Services$7,500Housing & Shelter$4,500Philanthropy$4,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION: $6,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $5,598 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPELOTONIA: $4,053 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC: $3,425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLAT ROCK HOMES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME DIAGNOSIS NETWORK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAROOSTOOK COUNTY ACTION PROGRAM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCELEBRATE BIRTHDAYS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Childrens Advocacy Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDMORE WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM A LA CART: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIT TAKES A VILLAGE CANINE RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF AROOSTOOK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL AROOSTOOK HUMANE SOCIETY: $421 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MERIDEN & WALLINGFORD INC: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHarbor House of Central Florida Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAT ROCK HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME DIAGNOSIS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds AROOSTOOK COUNTY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CELEBRATE BIRTHDAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOMER ELEMENTARY PTO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Emerald Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Emerald Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Harbor House of Central Florida Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation: 4% of income from government
  • Clean the World Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Emerald Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Emerald Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Emerald’s filings →

More from the funding graph