Skip to content
The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester

The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester, a leader in healthcare, is dedicated to providing its community with excellent services offered with dignity, caring, and respect.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.8MHuman Services$294kCrime & Legal$160kCommunity Improvement$71kFood & Nutrition$53kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $519,072, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,286,116 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $767,044 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$836M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Amoskeag Health$300,000
Easter Seals New Hampshire$58,332
Granite United Way$26,000
Catie's Closet Inc$25,000
Organization for Refugee & Immigrant Success$22,640
Queen City Bike Collective$20,000
Friends of Aine$15,000
Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce$14,100
New Hampshire Food Bank$13,500
Swimming with a Mission$10,000
My Turn Inc$8,500
Manchester Police Athletic League$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $443k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Catie's Closet Inc: $25k → 8%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $58k → 7%Catie's Closet Inc: $25k → 8%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $54k → 7%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $53k → 7%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $49k → 7%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $38k → 7%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $36k → 7%Fresh Start Food Hub: $28k → 7%Organization for Refugee & Immigrant Success: $23k → 7%Organzation for Refugee and Immigrant Success: $20k → 7%Fresh Start Food Hub: $11k → 7%New Hampshire Food Bank: $14k → 7%Swimming with a Mission: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 9 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$8.2M
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+167%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    Amoskeag Health
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +50%
  • ES
    Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $287k · revenue +57%
  • OF
    ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $82k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $160k · revenue +167%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TN
    THE NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
New Hampshire Public Health Association

Nhpha is a member driven organization that champions public health policy and practice, enriches the workforce and inspires leaders to improve the publics health.

—
4
Elliot Health System

Elliot Health System strives to inspire wellness, heal our patients, and serve with compassion in every interaction.

Health
5
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Visiting Nurse Association of Manchester and Southern New Hampshire Inc

We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.

Health
7
Manchester Mental Health Foundation

To raise and maintain funds to support mental health care for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.

Health
8
The Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc

To provide mental health services for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.

—
9
Greater Nashua Council on Alcoholism Keystone Hall

The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.

Health
10
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
11
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
12
Massachusetts E-Health Collaborative
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New England Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Queen City Bicycle Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Foundation for Healthy Communities: $4,566,087 · HealthFoundation for Healthy CommunitiesAmoskeag Health: $2,992,610 · HealthAmoskeag Health+1 more: $15,000 · HealthEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $287,211 · Human ServicesORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND: $81,881 · Human ServicesCatie's Closet Inc: $50,000 · Human Services+2 more: $23,500 · Human ServicesCity of Manchester New Hampshire: $60,495 · OtherGRANITE UNITED WAY: $49,500 · OtherGREATER MANCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $41,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherTHE NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · OtherMy Turn Inc: $8,500 · OtherTown of Hudson: $7,500 · OtherTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $160,000 · Crime & LegalQUEEN CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE: $60,000 · Community ImprovementMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $6,000 · Youth Development
Health$7,573,697Human Services$442,592Other$187,245Crime & Legal$160,000Community Improvement$60,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Healthy Communities: $4,566,087 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetAmoskeag Health: $2,992,610 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $287,211 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $160,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND: $81,881 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetQUEEN CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE: $60,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetCatie's Closet Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY: $49,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER MANCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $41,250 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF AINE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Southern New Hampshir…Cogswell Benevolent T…Eastern Bank Foundati…Norwin S and Elizabet…Manchester Community …Endowment For Health …Dartmouth-Hitchcock C…Mary Hitchcock Memori…Granite United WayHarvard Pilgrim Healt…The Bank of America C…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Southern New Hampshire University · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Manchester Community Resource Center Inc · Endowment For Health Inc · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Granite United Way · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Catie's Closet Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The New England Council Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home