Skip to content
The Eibshutz-Raphan Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Eibshutz-Raphan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$240k
Granted FY2022
44
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$92kHuman Services$84kReligion$60kEducation$58kInternational$45kRecreation & Sports$45kArts & Culture$26kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2022 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k34 grants · $129k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $111k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish National Fund$15,000
Israel Cancer Research Fund$15,000
Syracuse University-Jewish Studies$11,000
The Friendship Circle Metrowest NJ$10,000
Jewish Board of FamilyChildren Svc$10,000
The Harvey School$10,000
Hillel at Baruch College$10,000
Michael J Fox Foundation$10,000
Jewish Family Service of Central NJ$10,000
Camp Ramah in the Berkshires$10,000
American Jewish Committee$7,000
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute$5,000
United Jewish Federation Stamford$5,000
ASPCA$5,000
New Jersey Angels$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Simon Wisenthal Center: $3k → 14%Sansum Diabetes Research Institute: $5k → 14%Camp Ramah in the Bekshires: $14k → 9%Feeding Westchester: $3k → 9%Syracuse University-Jewish Studies: $11k → 14%The Museum of Jewish Heritage: $5k → 17%World Wildlife Fund: $5k → 14%EJ Schoke Jewish Family Service: $5k → 9%University of Chicago - Schol Fd: $10k → 14%Konscious Youth Development Svc: $6k → 6%Jewish Family Service of Central NJ: $5k → 7%Jewish Family Servive of Cent NJ: $10k → 10%New Jersey Angels: $5k → 11%The Friendship Circle Metrowest NJ: $10k → 16%American Kidney Fund: $5k → 8%Camp Ramah in the Berkshires: $11k → 9%The Harvey School: $10k → 9%Syracuse University-Jewish Studies: $5k → 14%Museum of Jewish Heritage: $4k → 17%World Wildlife Fund: $3k → 14%University of Chicago: $5k → 14%Konscious Youth Development Svc: $5k → 6%Jewish Family Service of Central NJ: $10k → 10%The Friendship Circle Metrowest NJ: $6k → 16%Camp Ramah in the Berkshires: $10k → 9%EJ Schoke Jewish Family Service: $4k → 9%Temple Beth Shalom: $5k → 16%Camp Ramah in the Berkshires: $5k → 9%Jewish Board of Family Childrens: $10k → 17%Temple Beth Shalom Livingston NJ: $5k → 16%Jewish Board of FamilyChildren Svc: $10k → 17%Temple Beth Shalom: $5k → 16%The New York Public Library: $5k → 17%United Jewish Federation Stamford: $5k → 9%Stamford Jewish Community Center: $5k → 9%Jewish National Fund: $15k → 17%Jewish National Fund: $15k → 17%Jewish Board Family Children Svs: $14k → 17%The Alzheimers Found of America: $5k → 17%see attached: $285k → 17%See attached list: $224k → 17%ASPCA: $5k → 17%Israel Cancer Research Fund: $19k → 17%Israel Cancer Research Fund: $15k → 17%Israel Cancer Research Fund: $11k → 17%Hillel at Baruch College: $10k → 17%Hillel at Baruch College: $5k → 17%Hillel at Baruch College: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 23 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$310k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+34%

Still filing today

65%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
HealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $48k · revenue +92%
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +115%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • JB
    Jewish Board Family Children Svs
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • JF
    Jewish Family Servive of Cent NJ
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • UO
    University of Chicago - Schol Fd
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
12
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $47,500 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $40,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INCHILLEL AT BARUCH INC: $20,000 · OtherHILLEL AT BARUCH INCSyracuse University-Jewish Studies: $16,000 · OtherThe Friendship Circle Metrowest NJ: $15,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NJ: $15,000 · OtherJewish Board Family Children Svs: $14,000 · Other+34 more: $165,500 · Other+34 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $30,000 · InternationalJEWISH NA…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,500 · InternationalFRIENDS O…THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $3,500 · InternationalTHE SHALO…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $20,000 · HealthSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 · HealthTHE AMERICAN TINNITUS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $1,500 · HealthTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $9,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $5,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $9,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $8,500 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $17,000 · Civil RightsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · Animals
Other$333,500International$41,000Health$34,000Education$29,000Arts & Culture$28,500Civil Rights$17,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT BARUCH INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NJ: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION STAMFORD NEW CANAAN DARIEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN TINNITUS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOMRIM SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…FjcJewish Communal FundThe Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY13.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fjc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eibshutz-Raphan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eibshutz-Raphan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Eibshutz-Raphan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Eibshutz-Raphan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $285k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eibshutz-Raphan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home