Skip to content
The Edward and Teresa Nolan Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Edward and Teresa Nolan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$178kEducation$100kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$14kHealth$14kYouth Development$12kPhilanthropy$7kPublic Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIENA COLLEGE$25,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH$15,000
FRANCISCAN FRIARS - SIENA FRIARY$5,000
LONG ISLAND CARES INC$4,500
ST FRANCIS PREP HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
LA SALLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,500
XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH CONCORDIA$2,000
SISTERS OF THE RESURRECTION$2,000
FRANCISCAN FRIARS - HOLY NAME PROVINCE NY$2,000
MISSIONARIES OF SAINT CHARLES$2,000
HEART OF THE HAMPTONS$2,000
FATHERS OF SAINT CHARLES$2,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
MINISTRY OF CARING$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $1k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $500 → 14%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $3k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $3k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $2k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $1k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
KS
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$354k · 35 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
10

Total granted

$354k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-7%

Still filing today

37%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SIENA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +5%
  • LI
    Long Island Cares Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +7%
  • FA
    FRANCISCAN ACTION NETWORK
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • MD
    MARIA DROSTE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • BF
    BEATS FOR BELLA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GREATER NY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
6
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
St Francis Hospital

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

—
9
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
10
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Bon Secours New York Health System Affiliated Group

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

—
12
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Westchester Inc; the most unlike its peers is The John Marie and Joseph Whalen Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $32,500 · OtherXAVIER HIGH SCHOOLFRANCISCAN FRIARS - SIENA FRIARY: $30,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN FRIARS - SIENA FRIARYIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH: $29,250 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCHST FRANCIS PREP HIGH SCHOOL: $17,750 · OtherST FRANCIS PREP HIGH SCHOOLFRANCISCAN FRIARS - HOLY NAME PROVINCE NY: $16,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN FRIARS - HOLY NAME PROVINCE NYSISTERS OF THE RESURRECTION: $12,500 · OtherLA SALLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF SAINT CHARLES: $10,000 · Other+28 more: $114,500 · Other+28 moreSIENA UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationSIENA UNIVERSIT…Long Island Cares Inc: $13,500 · Human ServicesLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCALVARY FUND INC: $4,500 · HealthST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC: $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · HealthHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFRANCISCAN ACTION NETWORK: $5,000 · Civil RightsTHE JOHN MARIE AND JOSEPH WHALEN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMOHAWK & HUDSON RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals
Other$272,500Education$50,000Human Services$15,000Health$10,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Civil Rights$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIENA UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLA SALLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MINISTRY OF CARING INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN ACTION NETWORK: $5,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JOHN MARIE AND JOSEPH WHALEN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCALVARY FUND INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN LIFE CENTER NETWORK INCORPORATED: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOHAWK & HUDSON RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIENA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE MINISTRY OF CARING INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN MARIE AND JOSEPH WHALEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN LIFE CENTER NETWORK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Raymond James Charita…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Verizon FoundationNJ11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edward and Teresa Nolan Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edward and Teresa Nolan Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • The Ministry of Caring Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Franciscan Life Center Network Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edward and Teresa Nolan Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Edward and Teresa Nolan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward and Teresa Nolan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home