Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Eagle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
101
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$6.7MReligion$2.0MHealth$532kYouth Development$341kCommunity Improvement$320kInternational$284kPublic Benefit$100kPhilanthropy$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k67 grants · $304k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $495k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN VENTURES$300,000
NORTH DAKOTA TEEN CHALLENGE$150,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY-ST PAUL$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL$67,500
BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY$65,000
BETHEL UNIVERSITY$62,500
MINNESOTA TEEN CHALLENGE$50,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$22,500
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$21,967
NORTH HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$17,722
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON$15,000
BOB JONES UNIVERSITY$15,000
4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA$15,000
FAITH BAPTIST BIBLE COLLEGE$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RISING HOPE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.1M · 162 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

162 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2024, 91 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

162
85

Total granted

$9.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+18%

Still filing today

35%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $286k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $845k · revenue +75%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $598k · revenue +32%
  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $267k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • 4K
    4 KIDS CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • JM
    JOSH MCDOWELL MINISTRY
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
  • SW
    SOUTH WEST TWIN CITIES YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $121k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
3
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
6
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
11
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Baptist University and the most unlike its peers is Rising Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsChristian Youth CampsCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Military Veterans SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 73 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr16%8%35–55yr18%70%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%8%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr16%12%35–55yr18%51%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/108
the rest of the field
10%
3,828/38,881

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/89
Grantees still filing
71/89
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST — $1,215,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL — $845,185 · OtherCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAULBETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY — $360,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARYURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $320,000 · Other+134 more — $3,999,450 · Other+134 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL — $597,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN -…BETHEL UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · EducationBETHEL UNIVERSITY4 KIDS CORP — $200,000 · Education4 KIDS CORPGrand Canyon University — $107,500 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $105,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas — $88,629 · Education+46 more — $998,880 · Education+46 morePULSE OUTREACH — $260,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $160,000 · Religion+1 more — $5,000 · ReligionMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $267,261 · Health+1 more — $7,536 · HealthCompassion International Incorporated — $97,200 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $9,500 · InternationalMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyRISING HOPE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$6,739,635Education$2,597,509Religion$425,000Health$274,797International$106,700Philanthropy$100,000Human Services$20,000Youth Development$15,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL — $845,185 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL — $597,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY — $500,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $320,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $267,261 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPULSE OUTREACH — $260,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $107,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $105,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $97,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas — $88,629 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $57,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE — $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central University — $53,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Master's Institute — $47,380 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetFaith Baptist Bible College — $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE — $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY — $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN COLLEGE — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mary — $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRISING HOPE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL INC — $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH RESOURCES — $15,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetPresentation College — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
  • Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
  • Who funds PULSE OUTREACH
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds University of St Thomas
  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE
  • Who funds North Central University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK26.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Ibm International Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · La Amundson Ohana Foundation · Communitygiving · Tulsa Community Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Council of Independent Colleges · Marguerite V Brown · Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Eagle Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Rollins College0% of income from government
  • Pensacola Christian College Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 279 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph