Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

Marguerite V Brown

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
24
Grants FY2025
21
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$549
Largest grant, FY2025
$9,849
Organizations funded a year
13 to 21
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
10
Total assets, FY2025
$755k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Marguerite V Brown funded were first-time grantees, receiving 24% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving23$41k35%
FY202421$39k33%
FY202314$36k29%
FY202219$45k47%
FY202118$41k50%
FY202013$38k23%
FY201919$38k53%
FY201821$38k67%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$348kHealth$2kScience & Tech$200

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
WY
SD
IA
CA
NE
MO
AZ
KS
TN
NC
LA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska$22,5785n/a
Creighton University$13,02060%
Buena Vista University$9,35340%
College of Saint Mary$5,49230%
Simpson College$5,10830%
Briar Cliff University$5,08320%
Coe College$4,33120%
Morningside University$4,06440%
Midland University$4,05230%
Grand View University$3,72120%
Show all 30 grantees
All grantees of Marguerite V Brown by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska$22,5785n/a
Creighton University$13,02060%
Buena Vista University$9,35340%
College of Saint Mary$5,49230%
Simpson College$5,10830%
Briar Cliff University$5,08320%
Coe College$4,33120%
Morningside University$4,06440%
Midland University$4,05230%
Grand View University$3,72120%
Clarkson College$2,11510%
Central College$2,04710%
Rockhurst University$2,00010%
North Central University$2,00010%
Kansas Wesleyan University$2,00010%
Drake University$1,92940%
William Penn University$1,50010%
Umkc Foundation$1,34510%
Grand Canyon University$1,04920%
Lipscomb University$1,00010%
Lees-McRae College Inc$1,00010%
Bellevue University$1,00010%
Northwest University$1,00010%
Cornell College$1,00010%
Luther College$68610%
Kansas State University$5491n/a
Upper Iowa University$54910%
Nebraska Wesleyan University$50010%
California Baptist University$50010%
Rochester Institute of Technology$20010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 48 recipients with no EIN on record ($249k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Marguerite V Brown supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreighton University: $13,020 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBuena Vista University: $9,353 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCollege of Saint Mary: $5,492 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson College: $5,108 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBriar Cliff University: $5,083 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCoe College: $4,331 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMorningside University: $4,064 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMidland University: $4,052 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGrand View University: $3,721 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClarkson College: $2,115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral College: $2,047 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRockhurst University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKansas Wesleyan University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDrake University: $1,929 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Penn University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUmkc Foundation: $1,345 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $1,049 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLipscomb University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLees-McRae College Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBellevue University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLuther College: $686 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Iowa University: $549 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNebraska Wesleyan University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Baptist University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 28.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bestenlehner D and F Educational TrMO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust · Iowa College Foundation · The Eagle Foundation · Ottumwa Regional Legacy Foundation Inc · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Louis J Elbert Trust · Joseph J Sinek Scholarship Trust · Bernice E Peterson Scholarship Trust · Mahana-Cong Church Scholar Found · Willard E and Ella P Thompson Educational Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Marguerite V Brown with peer funders

About Marguerite V Brown

How much does Marguerite V Brown give?
Marguerite V Brown reported 24 grants totaling $40,671 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 21 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Marguerite V Brown fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (99%), Health (1%), Science & Tech (0%).
Who are Marguerite V Brown's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska ($23k), Creighton University ($13k), Buena Vista University ($9k).
Does Marguerite V Brown fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Marguerite V Brown accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Marguerite V Brown?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr, Roy J Carver Charitable Trust, Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust.
Where is Marguerite V Brown based?
Marguerite V Brown is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marguerite V Brown’s filings →

More from the funding graph