Skip to content

· Private foundation

The E Merle & Ollie W Edwards Fou

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$172kEnvironment$36kReligion$36kHuman Services$34kHealth$32kScience & Tech$10kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NC MARINE AND ESTUARY FOUNDATIO$10,000
ECU COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS$5,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$3,500
HELPS$2,500
ECU HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
PINETOPS UNITED METHODIST MEN$1,000
BLADEN WE CARE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 12 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
32

Total granted

$228k
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+20%

Still filing today

42%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue +85%
  • MEREDITH COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +1%
  • EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $18k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SN
    SMITH'S NEW HOME OFWB CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • PC
    PITT COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • LF
    LCC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina State University Foundation Inc

Supports, by financial assistance and otherwise, the various colleges within the university, the libraries, and other university-connected functions.

Education
2
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education
3
Norfolk Christian Schools

It is the mission of norfolk christian schools to equip students spiritually, intellectually, and physically to love god and to serve him as christ's ambassadors in the world.

Education
4
Charlotte Christian School

Charlotte christian school is a christ-centered, college preparatory school, equipping and developing students to effectively integrate biblical truth and learning nto their daily lives and to impact the culture for christ.

—
5
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
6
Catawba College

Catawba college is committed to providing students an education rich in personal attention that blends the knowledge and competencies of liberal studies with career preparation. catawba college draws strength from judeo-christian values,…

Education
7
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
8
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
9
Cary Christian School Incorporated

Cary christian school provides an excellent classical education founded upon a biblical worldview. classical christian education is an integrated approach to learning which complements students' natural learning stages while infusing…

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
12
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Carolina University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Helping a HeroOrg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NC MARINE AND ESTUARY FOUNDATIO: $25,000 · OtherTHE NC MARINE AND ESTUARY FOUNDATIOTHE SALVATION ARMY: $20,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSMITH'S NEW HOME OFWB CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherSMITH'S NEW HOME OFWB CHURCHEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION…PITT COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $12,750 · OtherPITT COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIONLCC FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · OtherLCC FOUNDATION INCSAMUEL J WORNON III INNOVATION: $10,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC: $10,000 · Other+28 more: $68,000 · Other+28 moreSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $100,000 · EducationSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCMEREDITH COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationMEREDITH COLLEGEHOPE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $8,500 · EducationHOPE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC: $7,000 · Education+3 more: $6,200 · EducationMethodist Home for Children Foundation: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHelping a HeroOrg: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST: $1,000 · Environment
Other$196,250Education$156,700Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$1,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $100,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMEREDITH COLLEGE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCARY ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMethodist Home for Children Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHelping a HeroOrg: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEREDITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds CARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Methodist Home for Children Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Helping a HeroOrg ↗
  • Who funds EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation IncNC19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The E Merle & Ollie W Edwards Fou funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The E Merle & Ollie W Edwards Fou. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The E Merle & Ollie W Edwards Fou?

    Find your warmest path to The E Merle & Ollie W Edwards Fou through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E Merle & Ollie W Edwards Fou’s filings →

    More from the funding graph