Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Domanica Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$701kEducation$396kFood & Nutrition$344kHuman Services$226kHealth$163kReligion$73kCommunity Improvement$69kYouth Development$68kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $137k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ELIZABETH SHELTER$30,000
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$20,000
THE LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION$15,000
INTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK$12,000
SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION$10,000
MOUNT SAINT VINCENT HOME$10,000
THIRD AVENUE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION$10,000
ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS$10,000
MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT$10,000
POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC$10,000
SPECIAL DELIVERY SAN DIEGO$9,000
KITCHENS FOR GOOD$8,000
GRAND CENTRAL STATION$6,500
JAFCO CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER$6,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC$5,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY INC: $4k → 10%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%ARCHULETA COUNTY VICTIMS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $5k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY INC: $2k → 10%ARCHULETA COUNTY VICTIMS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $4k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY INC: $2k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY INC: $2k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY INC: $2k → 10%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $4k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 10%LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 10%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $4k → 11%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $4k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 10%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $4k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 10%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $5k → 12%LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 10%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $3k → 12%LOAVES AND FISHES: $1k → 10%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $3k → 12%VETERANS FOR VETERANS OF ARCHULETA COUNTY: $1k → 10%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $2k → 12%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $3k → 11%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $3k → 11%POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 17%POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 17%POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 17%POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 17%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $2k → 11%POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 17%POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 17%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 11%SAN DIEGO SENIORS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ND
NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 62 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

62 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
27

Total granted

$2.1M
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+36%

Still filing today

66%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +93%
  • AP
    ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +325%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • BA
    BALLET ARIZONAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
2
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
3
Crisis House

The mission of crisis house is to respond immediately to stop the cycle of domestic violence and homelessness and to connect families and individuals to crucial resources that empower them to renew their lives.

Human Services
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
6
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
7
Urban Angels Co Scott Lutwak

Urban angels is designed to nourish and provide food for the homeless and hungry of san dieo, ca. urban angels provides feeding services every wednesday in collboration with the salvation army and is the primary food provider for residents…

—
8
St Francis Center

For the performance of charitable acts and service to the less fortunate.

—
9
Community Research Foundation Inc

Crf, in partnership with our clients and stakeholders, designs, delivers and evaluates innovative and exemplary behavioral health and social services in a manner that is both culturally and trauma competent, providing these services with…

Unclassified
10
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
11
St Vincent Depaul Middletown

St. vincent depaul middletown (svdm) was founded in 1980 by the sisters of mercy and the catholic diocese of norwich. svdm's mission is to provide food, shelter and basic human services to poor and homeless individuals regardless of race,…

—
12
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Youth Services; the most unlike its peers is Somerset County Mobile Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/53
Grantees still filing
42/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROW SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $250,000 · OtherGROW SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGEALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $130,800 · OtherALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESSMOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC: $85,000 · OtherMOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INCLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR AT VILLA GUADALUPE: $39,000 · OtherSANTA FE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $68,500 · OtherSANTA FE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC+52 more: $406,850 · Other+52 moreSpecial Delivery San Diego: $133,000 · EducationSpecial Deliver…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $124,250 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CH…FRIENDS OF SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY INC: $18,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF SAN …MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $750 · EducationSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $240,000 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ELIZABET…SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $38,500 · Housing & ShelterSAN DIEGO RESC…Third Avenue Charitable Organization: $71,000 · Food & NutritionThird Aven…GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION: $45,500 · Food & NutritionGRAYSON GR…SOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK: $37,600 · Food & NutritionSOMERSET C…TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC: $28,500 · Food & NutritionTRI-COUNTY…MEALS ON WHEELS OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC: $21,400 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON W…POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesPOTTER'S …ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQ…Texoma Family Shelter: $29,000 · Human ServicesTexoma Fa…CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesCLOTHES T…FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $12,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PR…LOAVES & FISHES INC: $11,350 · Human ServicesLOAVES & …ARCHULETA COUNTY VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $9,000 · Human Services+5 more: $11,000 · Human Services+5 moreLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $47,900 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $38,500 · HealthMental Health Association of NM: $19,000 · HealthVIA HEART PROJECT: $12,700 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $8,000 · Health+5 more: $7,500 · HealthINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $96,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN: $9,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$980,150Education$291,000Housing & Shelter$278,500Food & Nutrition$204,000Human Services$177,850Health$133,600Philanthropy$107,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $240,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetSpecial Delivery San Diego: $133,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $130,800 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $124,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $96,250 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetThird Avenue Charitable Organization: $71,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $68,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetPOTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $47,900 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION: $45,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $38,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $38,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK: $37,600 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTexoma Family Shelter: $29,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC: $28,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSangre de Cristo Volunteers for Community Inc: $25,000 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC: $21,400 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetMental Health Association of NM: $19,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY INC: $18,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetMETRO CARING: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTARTING OVER MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOPEWORKS: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT: $12,700 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $12,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSON HOUSE CRISIS INTERVENTION INC: $12,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES INC: $11,350 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetARCHULETA COUNTY VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $9,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET ARIZONA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGrossmont Hospital Foundation: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST CENTRAL MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Special Delivery San Diego ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Third Avenue Charitable Organization ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds POTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texoma Family Shelter ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Sangre de Cristo Volunteers for Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Association of NM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO CARING ↗
  • Who funds STARTING OVER MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds VIA HEART PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOUSE CRISIS INTERVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank · Sempra Foundation · Lucky Duck Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Domanica Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Domanica Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • Family Promise of Northern New Castle County: 73% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Domanica Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Domanica Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Domanica’s filings →

More from the funding graph