· Public charity
Lucky Duck Foundation
The mission of the Lucky Duck Foundation is to prevent and alleviate the suffering of homelessness throughout San Diego County.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 29 grants below total $2,100,427 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,574,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $474,180 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k15 grants · $332k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $983k
- $250k+2 grants · $785k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION | $500,000 |
| SAN DIEGO CONTINUING ED | $285,173 |
| SHORELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $120,000 |
| SERVING SENIORS | $114,550 |
| URBAN STREET ANGELS | $110,000 |
| HUMBLE DESIGN INC | $101,153 |
| SAN DIEGO HOUSING COMMISSION | $100,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $98,733 |
| YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION | $69,000 |
| CHURCH OF SALVATION | $65,000 |
| DOORS OF CHANGE | $55,000 |
| HOUSING 4 THE HOMELESS | $50,000 |
| VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| CURA SMILES | $50,000 |
| HOME START INC | $43,667 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC4× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +19%
- TSThe San Diego College of Continuing Education Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +186%
- YAYOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC4× · 2019–2024 · $554k · revenue +579% · 54% of their budget
Funded once
ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $400k · revenue +124%- COCOUNTY OF SAN DIEGOone grant, 2020 · $377k
Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Countiesone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To increase, preserve and improve quality affordable housing opportunities for working families.
Feeding the homeless population in san d
The Federation brings together representatives of affordable housing community development corporations with others interested in the development and management of housing for low and moderate income persons in San Diego County to mutually…
Community housingworks ("chw or the organization") is a nonprofit california corporation incorporated on june 20, 1988. chw believes that opportunity begins with a stable home. the organization provides and builds life-changing affordable…
San diego interfaith housing foundation's mission is to sponsor and assist in the development of quality low cost, single and multi-family housing for low income and handicapped persons in the greater san diego metropolitan area.
The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…
To renovate and preserve affordable homeownership for low income homeowners and revitalize neighborhoods throughout san diego.
To assist in the development of affordable housing for low income residents of san diego county.
To assist in the development of affordable housing for low income residents of san diego county.
The "ranch" is a temporary home to adult men who have a sincere desire to be set free from drugs, alcohol, or addictive behaviors. the ranch uses christian principles, bible studies and practical training to prepare residents to resume a…
Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.
Mid-city community advocacy network works to build a safe, productive, and healthy community for the residents of city heights and greater san diego through collaboration, advocacy, and organizing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is Cohen Veterans Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds The San Diego College of Continuing Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SDHC BUILDING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN STREET ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL TASK FORCE ON THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds HOME START INC ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds DREAMS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
- Who funds SHORELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Doors of Change ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds San Diego Taxpayers Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds WE SEE YOU INC ↗
- Who funds MCALISTER INSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT & EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds CURA SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Housing 4 the Homeless ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Rise Up Industries ↗
- Who funds SHELTER CARE PROVIDERS OF SAN DIEGO INC DBA HOMEAID SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Sempra Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank · The Parker Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lucky Duck Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cohen Veterans Network Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.