Skip to content
The Delloakes Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Delloakes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$748k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$699kPublic Benefit$525kEducation$417kCivil Rights$380kPublic Safety & Disaster$204kFood & Nutrition$136kHuman Services$40kHealth$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $635k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KQED INC$150,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$100,000
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGT$70,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$60,000
PRO PUBLICA INC$55,000
PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT$50,000
PBS FOUNDATION$50,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION$50,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC$50,000
STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND$40,000
DEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION$25,000
OPERATION BBQ RELIEF$10,000
LOAVES AND FISHES OF CONTRA COSTA$10,000
CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT$10,000
FEEDING AMERICA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $10k → 8%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $10k → 8%SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC: $15k → 9%SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
LA
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 20 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
22

Total granted

$2.1M
$234k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+5%

Still filing today

90%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $191k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionCivil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +10%
  • MM
    MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA
    6× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +54%
  • KI
    KQED INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +140%
  • SP
    SHANTI PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
12
Center for Science in the Public Interest

The center for science in the public interest is america's food and health watchdog. cspi envisions a healthy population with reduced impact and burden of preventable diseases and an equitable food system that makes healthy, sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rutherford Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
26/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KQED INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INCPRO PUBLICA INC: $275,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INCPBS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePBS FOUNDATION+2 more: $14,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $300,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CAL…THE GUY FIERI FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationCHANCE ACADEMY: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $305,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY…DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Crime & LegalDEMOCRACY FORWAR…CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $295,000 · Public BenefitCITIZENS FOR RE…STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND D/B/A DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND: $40,000 · Public BenefitSTATE DEMOCRACY…THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN INDEPEN…MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $50,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF S…CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGT: $45,000 · OtherCITIZENS FOR RESPONS…Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $25,000 · OtherLoaves and Fishes of…SHANTI PROJECT: $15,000 · OtherFeeding America: $28,000 · OtherFeeding AmericaREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $15,000 · OtherTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $20,000 · OtherOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $20,000 · OtherSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $20,000 · OtherSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE: $35,000 · OtherSHERWOOD FORESTRY SE…NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other+14 more: $81,000 · Other+14 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $162,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $10,000 · InternationalPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $50,000 · Civil RightsDEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$639,000Education$395,000Crime & Legal$355,000Public Benefit$335,000Other$444,000International$182,000Civil Rights$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $305,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $300,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKQED INC: $300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $295,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $275,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $162,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND D/B/A DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE: $35,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSHANTI PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GUY FIERI FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHANCE ACADEMY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMicrobeTV Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONARD HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINK STRYJEWSKI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFarm to Pantry: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA ROSA UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCaringBridge: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTHERFORD PTA: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Sonoma County Communi…Jewish Community Fede…Tides FoundationMarin Community Found…Morgan Stanley Global…Sutter Bay HospitalsNational Philanthropi…McNabb FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…New Venture FundSilicon Valley Commun…
The San Francisco FoundationCA15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Tides Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Sutter Bay Hospitals · National Philanthropic Trust · McNabb Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · New Venture Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Delloakes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Delloakes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Delloakes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home