Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Delgado Family Burn Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$70kReligion$20kInternational$17kHealth$14kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kArts & Culture$100
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$116k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TITHELY127 PROJECT$5,000
BURN SURVIVOR DONATION GO FUND ME$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN$2,000
CAPTAIN TIM HOBAN GO FUND ME$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$1,613
FAMILY OF 8 BURNED OUT OF HOME GO F$1,555
TIM HANNOLD GO FUND ME$1,190
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HOPE HEALS$1,000
EPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $4k → 10%HOPE HEALS: $1k → 13%HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $1k → 10%EPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 11%EPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC: $1k → 11%EPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
CA
VA
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43k · 7 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
25

Total granted

$43k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+40%

Still filing today

71%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • HH
    HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $5k · revenue +475%
  • JH
    JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • FC
    FAMILY CHURCH LAKE PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
2
Women Intercessors for the Church and Nations

To reach the world with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ through Prayer and Intercession, Evangelism, Seminars, Mercy Missions, Leadership Training, Publications and Conferences and Outreaches.

Religion
3
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
4
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Birthmother Bridge Ministries
—
6
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
7
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
8
Mission 127

To bring widow awareness to pastors, churches and communities nationwide in accordance to james 1:27. to ensure that widows are no longer forgotten.

—
9
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
10
Misfit Mission

Misfits Mission purpose is to lead women to restoration in Christ through transitional living and godly counsel of Christian leaders.

Health
11
Unpack Incorporated

Unpack is a two-tiered approach to help women unpack the pain of their pasts as well as help them on the road to residency where they can unpack their things and make a home for themselves and their children. we work with single women…

Crime & Legal
12
Foreknown Ministries

Foreknown Ministries (FM) will operate programs that empower mothers and fathers to find healing after pregnancy or infant loss. In the US, approximately 1 in 100 pregnancies end in stillbirth (after 20 weeks). The experience is often…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hannah's Home of South Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY CHURCH LAKE PARK: $10,000 · OtherFAMILY CHURCH LAKE PARKBURN SURVIVOR DONATION GO FUND ME: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSION: $5,000 · OtherTITHELY127 PROJECT: $5,000 · Other+25 more: $34,809 · Other+25 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN…World Help: $1,000 · ReligionWorld Hel…HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $4,997 · Human ServicesEPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesHope Heals Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesMercy Ships International: $4,000 · InternationalWOMEN IN THE WINDOW INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,795 · InternationalJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,864 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$95,809Religion$11,000Human Services$9,497International$5,795Health$4,864Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $4,997 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,864 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPHOENIX SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN IN THE WINDOW INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,795 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWorld Help: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope Heals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds EPHESIANS 428 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN THE WINDOW INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds World Help ↗
  • Who funds Hope Heals Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Delgado Family Burn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Delgado Family Burn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Delgado Family Burn’s filings →

More from the funding graph