· Private foundation
The Davenport Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $240k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $855k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MERCERSBURG ACADEMY | $435,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND | $420,000 |
| HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY | $225,000 |
| SANFORD SCHOOL | $213,000 |
| CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK | $150,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART | $140,000 |
| BRANDYWINE RIVER MUSEUM & CONSERVANCY | $130,000 |
| MALVERN PREPATORY SCHOOL | $120,000 |
| COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE | $100,000 |
| MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC | $100,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME | $100,000 |
| TUFTS UNIVERSITY | $95,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA ZOO | $75,000 |
| SQUASHSMARTS | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
56 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSANFORD SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +52%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND5× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +12%
Trustees of Tufts College9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +50%
Funded once
- MPMALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +79%
- CSCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORYone grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +9%
- VUVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster General Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Elmiras Wildlife Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANFORD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds MALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds MELMARK INC ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Eckerd College ↗
- Who funds REACH RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds KIND TO KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds THERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds THE WETLANDS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Welfare Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · The Dansko Foundation Inc · Hamilton Family Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Cabot-Kjellerup Foundation · The Smith Foundation Aka the Hoxie Harrison Smith Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Davenport Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Riverside Development Corp — 100% of income from government
- Kind to Kids Foundation — 69% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Kalmar Nyckel Foundation — 14% of income from government
- Delaware Community Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- The Wetlands Institute — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Pilot School Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Washington College — 0% of income from government
- Eckerd College — 0% of income from government
- The Independence School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Sanford School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Davenport Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Davenport Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.