· Private foundation
Beverly Westheimer Wellnitz Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of BEVERLY WESTHEIMER WELLNITZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MORE FOUNDATION | $5,500 |
| GLORIA S AINSWORTH DAY CARE CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA | $5,000 |
| YMCA | $3,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARTER COUNTY | $3,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE BEHAVIORAL WELLNESS CENTER | $3,000 |
| ARDMORE SOUP KITCHEN | $3,000 |
| ARDMORE ANIMAL SHELTER | $3,000 |
| A READING INC | $3,000 |
| CARTER COUNTY CASA | $3,000 |
| ARDMORE CITY SCHOOLS | $3,000 |
| THE FAMILY SHELTER OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA | $3,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $3,000 |
| COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S SHELTER | $2,500 |
| NAOMI HOUSE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MORE FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +0%
- ARA READING INC6× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +58%
COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +151%
Funded once
- OHOAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +19%
- ALARDMORE LITTLE THEATRE INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +86%
- IAIMPACT ARDMORE INCone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.
To provide ambulance and emergency medical services to carter and eastern jefferson counties, ok, home to some 49,000 people.
To rehabilitate homeless and drug addicts
To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons
To encourage, foster and stimulate commerce, trade, business finance and professional interests: to stimulate, encourage and promote cooperation and exchange among businesses; to promote, advance and stimulate civic, business, commercial,…
The organization is engaged in the service of rehabilitating users of alcohol and drugs. the center is also involved in community service programs, dui schools and out-patient counseling.
Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma
The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
An organization that provides a safe place for victims of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault, and stalking as they make plans and arrangements to recover from trauma and begin new lives.
To provide information, recreational, educational, and cultural resources to a seven county area of Southeastern Oklahoma through a regional library system.
to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Youth Services of Southern Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Ardmore Beautification Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MORE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARDMORE SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds A READING INC ↗
- Who funds ARBUCKLE LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CLINICINC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SHELTER OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD AND RESOURCE CENTER OF SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA LIBRARY SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds OAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ARDMORE LITTLE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ARDMORE INC ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NAOMI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER SOUTHWEST HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation Inc · Jerome Westheimer Family Foundation · McCrory Foundation · The Daube Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Ardmore Inc · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · Charles B Goddard Foundation Trust · The Merrick Foundation · United Way of South Central Oklahoma Inc · Kohaw Foundation Inc · Noble Research Institute LLC · Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beverly Westheimer Wellnitz Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 18% of income from government
- Good Shepherd Community Clinicinc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beverly Westheimer Wellnitz Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Beverly Westheimer Wellnitz Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.