Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Darden Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$255k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$938kHealth$419kReligion$55kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$27kArts & Culture$20kRecreation & Sports$14kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$22,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$100,000
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING CHILDREN$22,000
MD ANDERSON$22,000
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$21,000
WESTERN TEXAS COLLEGE$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%DAYSPRING VILLA: $4k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $3k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER: $3k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $2k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $2k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 27 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-34%

Still filing today

41%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $140k · revenue +14%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +125%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $61k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH RED RAIDERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • MC
    METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH - TULSA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
5
The University of Tulsa

The university of tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
LeTourneau University

Letourneau university is a comprehensive institution of christian higher education where educators engage learners to nurture christian virtue, to develop competency and ingenuity in their professional fields, to integrate faith and work,…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
12
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hardin-Simmons University; the most unlike its peers is Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $430,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYMD ANDERSON: $107,000 · OtherMD ANDERSONWESTERN TEXAS COLLEGE: $95,000 · OtherWESTERN TEXAS COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLEVELAND CLINIC: $70,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICTEXAS TECH RED RAIDERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $50,000 · OtherGATHERING PLACE: $45,000 · Other+18 more: $177,680 · Other+18 moreHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · EducationHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIV…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $61,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVE…TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATI…SPEARMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+3 more: $5,600 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $145,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $76,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 · Human ServicesIRON GATE INC: $17,500 · ReligionMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $17,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,044,680Education$268,600Health$221,000Human Services$24,000Religion$17,500Food & Nutrition$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $76,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $61,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $17,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $17,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSPEARMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Tulsa Schools: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRING SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPEARMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Tulsa Schools ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Coretz Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Darden Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Darden Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Darden Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph