· Private foundation
The Dan and Margaret Maddox Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k57 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $634k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIG | $94,500 |
| EQUITY ALLIANCE | $85,000 |
| SOUTHERN MOVEMENT COMMITTEE | $65,000 |
| LAUNCH PAD | $65,000 |
| TENNESSEE EDUCATORS OF COLOR ALLIAN | $62,000 |
| NASHVILLE PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER | $55,000 |
| BROOKLYN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY GARDEN | $55,000 |
| FUTURO INC | $52,500 |
| NASHVILLE FREEDOM SCHOOL PARTNERSHI | $50,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND | $50,000 |
| CONEXION AMERICAS | $45,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TN | $42,500 |
| SALAMA URBAN MINISTRIES | $40,000 |
| EDUCATION TRUST | $40,000 |
| TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 33% of The Dan and Margaret Maddox Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in TN; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
116 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCOASIS CENTER INC7× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +57%
- CRCUMBERLAND RIVER COMPACT INC7× · 2017–2024 · $346k · revenue +908%
- BUBelmont University3× · 2017–2020 · $307k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- PAPARKS AT KIMBRO STATION INCone grant, 2018 · $50k
- UUNMANAGEABLEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue ×20 · 36% of their budget
- DUDucks Unlimited Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $38k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Girls write nashville empowers expression through songwriting, production, mentorship and creative community for teen artists. we are an artist and educator-led 501(c)(3) creative youth development program in nashville, tn allied with…
Education
Ntc mission is to advance the diverse technology ecosystem by connecting and promoting members, attracting, growing and retaining tech talent, and providing opportunities to reinvest in the greater nashville community.
The nashville chamber public benefit foundation supports the work of the nashville area chamber of commerce through efforts to improve the quality of education, encourage public and private efforts around education, and to facilitate the…
Tennessee progress works to uplift the values and voices of the progressive movement across tennessee by elevating the issues that matter most to our communities. tennessee progress is a digital and communications hub for the progressive…
Our mission is to help African Americans & others in underserved communities achieve their highest true social parity, economic self-reliance, power and civil rights. The League promotes economic empowerment for those in Middle TN.
The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…
Opportunity nashville is an advocacy organization focused on improving educational equity in nashville. our mission is to ensure that every child in nashville has access to a high-quality public education.
Leadership nashville identifies and invites a diverse cross-section of professional, civic and charitable leaders to participate in an intensive program designed to give them a multi-dimensional understanding of the community.
The mission of the NCC is to ensure that every child in Nashville has access to a high-quality public school. 1 in every 5 Nashville public school students is enrolled in a charter school. The Nashville Charter Collaborative advocates on…
Nashville inner city ministry is a christ-centered community organization dedicated to empowering the spiritual, educational and vocational development of at-risk youth and their families.
Organized for the charitable purpose of advocating for inclusive development policies, and to do what is necessary to empower communities to stand up and take action to create lasting change for the economic good of people of the city.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alignment Nashville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stars Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OASIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CUMBERLAND RIVER COMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds Belmont University ↗
- Who funds CONEXION AMERICAS ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds SALAMA URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAUNCH PAD ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF MIDDLE TN ↗
- Who funds HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds Tennessee Educators of Color Alliance N ↗
- Who funds PENCIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE FREEDOM SCHOOL PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MONROE HARDING INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF MIDDLE TN INC ↗
- Who funds THE EQUITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HOMEWORK HOTLINE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN MOVEMENT COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds EQUAL CHANCE FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN WORD INC ↗
- Who funds Nashville Teacher Residency ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
- Who funds GOVERNOR'S EARLY LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Mill Ridge Park ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Frist Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · Hca Healthcare Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Joe C Davis Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Carolyn Smith Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Dan and Margaret Maddox Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.