Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dan & Jenny Coelho Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$274kInternational$206kEducation$99kCivil Rights$44kPhilanthropy$35kAnimals$19kRecreation & Sports$14kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SPARROW FUND$1,325
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THER EQUINE: $5k → 13%MOPS INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 12%PREBORN: $1k → 16%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $7k → 26%THER EQUINE: $4k → 13%THER EQUINE: $4k → 13%THER EQUINE: $3k → 13%OC UNITED: $2k → 10%OC UNITED: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
KY
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$588k · 23 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
30

Total granted

$588k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+18%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $120k · revenue +134%
  • MO
    Mercury One Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $49k · revenue +137%
  • BC
    Baja Christian Ministries
    7× · 2017–2023 · $46k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • WC
    WHITTIER CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue -19%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
2
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
3
Connectree

Connectree's vision is to help missionaries have the care and support they need, financially, physically, emotionally and spiritually, to carry out the ministry that god has called them to do. our 5 distinctives are: missionary care,…

Community Improvement
4
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
5
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
6
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
8
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
9
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
10
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
11
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
12
Life As Mission
Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life; the most unlike its peers is Sageview Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRM - NEAR EAST ORGANIZATION: $76,735 · OtherCRM - NEAR EAST ORGANIZATIONFAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES: $35,900 · OtherFAMILY LIFE MINISTRIESJOHN HAGEE MINISTRIES: $34,000 · OtherJOHN HAGEE MINISTRIESAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW JUSTICE: $33,700 · OtherAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW JUSTICEWHITTIER CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $30,688 · OtherWHITTIER CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLCHRISTIANS UNITED FOR ISRAEL: $24,000 · OtherCHRISTIANS UNITED FOR ISRAELCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $16,700 · Other+28 more: $73,907 · Other+28 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $119,776 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEBaja Christian Ministries: $46,150 · ReligionBaja Christian Ministries+2 more: $2,010 · ReligionMercury One Inc: $49,200 · InternationalMercury One IncALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $26,925 · InternationalALL GOD'S CHILD…Far Reaching Ministries: $16,450 · InternationalFar Reaching Mi…Acts 4 Rwanda Inc: $3,450 · International+1 more: $975 · InternationalSageview Foundation: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHER-EQUINE INC: $16,522 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesMOMCO GLOBAL INC: $5,300 · Human ServicesOC UNITED TOGETHER: $3,325 · Human ServicesMission Pre-Born Inc: $1,325 · Human ServicesBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $27,362 · Education+2 more: $1,005 · EducationRAD CAMP INC: $13,962 · Recreation & Sports
Other$325,630Religion$167,936International$97,000Philanthropy$35,000Human Services$32,972Education$28,367Recreation & Sports$13,962

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $119,776 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $49,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBaja Christian Ministries: $46,150 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSageview Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWHITTIER CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $30,688 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $27,362 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $26,925 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHER-EQUINE INC: $16,522 over 4y, 35% of budgetFar Reaching Ministries: $16,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAD CAMP INC: $13,962 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOMCO GLOBAL INC: $5,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetActs 4 Rwanda Inc: $3,450 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOC UNITED TOGETHER: $3,325 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SPARROW FUND: $2,650 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCANINE HUMANE NETWORK: $2,125 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJosiah Venture: $1,480 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $1,325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION DISCOVERY INC: $530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUPENDA FOR THE CHILDREN: $530 over 1y, 0.1% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $475 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baja Christian Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Sageview Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WHITTIER CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THER-EQUINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Far Reaching Ministries ↗
  • Who funds RAD CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MOMCO GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Acts 4 Rwanda Inc ↗
  • Who funds OC UNITED TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds THE SPARROW FUND ↗
  • Who funds CANINE HUMANE NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Sempra Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dan & Jenny Coelho Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dan & Jenny Coelho Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dan & Jenny Coelho Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph