Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Crary Social Ecology Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2022
22
Grants FY2022
17
Organizations funded FY2022
53%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of The Crary Social Ecology Fund’s FY2025 grant dollars went to California Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Crary Social Ecology Fund named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
11
’18
9
’19
5
’20
12
’21
13
’22
9
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 17
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
9
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 53% of the organizations The Crary Social Ecology Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 56% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $570k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
HealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalSocial ScienceCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202217$1.0M53%
FY202116$726k56%
FY202010$255k30%
FY201914$222k29%
FY201814$135k36%
FY201711$150kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.0MHuman Services$1.3MHealth$860kEducation$417kInternational$275kEnvironment$200kSocial Science$100kFood & Nutrition$80kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
NV
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DE
KS
AR
DC
AL
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 31 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.7M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Crary Social Ecology Fund supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 26 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInformed Consent Action Network: $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEscala Initiative Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetIndependent Medical Alliance: $155,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetProtection of the Educational Rights of Kids: $125,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCivilization Works: $120,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetWellness Forum Foundation Inc: $105,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology: $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCreateyourscholarship org: $100,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetAmerican Brownstone Institute: $75,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $75,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Health Defense: $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Frontline Nurses: $60,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetCommunity Agroecology Network: $60,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetReact19 Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetUc Santa Cruz Foundation: $47,871 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAt the Crossroads: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Breakthrough Institute: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSchool of Lost Borders: $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAxis Mundi Center for Mental Health: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEqual Justice Initiative: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians for Informed Consent: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetRainbow Lodge Retreat Center: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSt Johns Retirement Village: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSide by Side Va Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBoys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMultidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA19.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Marin Community Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Crary Social Ecology Fund with peer funders

About The Crary Social Ecology Fund

How much does The Crary Social Ecology Fund give?
The Crary Social Ecology Fund reported 22 grants totaling $1,010,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 17 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does The Crary Social Ecology Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (48%), Human Services (20%), Health (14%).
Who are The Crary Social Ecology Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Informed Consent Action Network ($200k), Escala Initiative Inc ($200k), Independent Medical Alliance ($155k).
Does The Crary Social Ecology Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 53% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Crary Social Ecology Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Crary Social Ecology Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, Donors Trust Inc, Bradley Impact Fund Inc.
Where is The Crary Social Ecology Fund based?
The Crary Social Ecology Fund is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crary Social Ecology’s filings →

More from the funding graph