Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE

ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $76,673 to it, the largest being Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ($25,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$3.4M
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$77k
Net assets
$3.0M
2/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What St Johns Retirement Village does

Mission

To honor the organization's residents' dignity, independence, and spirituality by providing them with a safe, supportive, and caring environment in which to live. The organization's mission is to provide housing, health care, and other related services to residents in its multi-level assisted living facilities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

On its FY2024 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

The organization resumed providing housing to residents in this fiscal year.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Multi-level assisted living facilities. Assisted living for active residents with minimal care needs in cottages and apartments called "the village". Assisted living for residents with moderate care needs in the personal care unit (pcu). Facility under rehabilitation with some cottages and apartments occupied.

    $935,381 spent$200,630 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $935,381.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($11M) Expenses 100 ($11M) Net assets 100 ($2.5M)2018 Revenue 100 ($11M) Expenses 98 ($10M) Net assets 113 ($2.9M)2019 Revenue 101 ($11M) Expenses 102 ($11M) Net assets 115 ($2.9M)2020 Revenue 105 ($11M) Expenses 103 ($11M) Net assets 132 ($3.3M)2021 Revenue 50 ($5.4M) Expenses 64 ($6.7M) Net assets 64 ($1.6M)2022 Revenue 20 ($2.1M) Expenses 35 ($3.7M) Net assets -1 ($-18556)2023 Revenue 12 ($1.3M) Expenses 9 ($902k) Net assets 61 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 2 ($260k) Expenses 8 ($826k) Net assets 38 ($968k)2025 Revenue 32 ($3.4M) Expenses 13 ($1.3M) Net assets 121 ($3.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (32)Expenses (13)Net assets (121)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $5.4M to $3.8M (−30%).

$6.6M
$6.8M
$6.4M
$6.4M
$5.4M
$3.8M
$3.9M
$3.1M
$3.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 14% · 2023 53% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$180k
’17
$334k
’18
$35k
’19
$425k
’20
−$1.3M
’21
−$1.6M
’22
$439k
’23
−$565k
’24
$2.1M
’25
4.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Stan Levers

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed9109898997
Joined·+2+1+0+2+0+9+1+3
No longer listed·12111815
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income rose $9k → $20k.

5 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE.

33%
largest funder
68%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 67% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 75% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

67% of ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $26k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $51k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 30%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE?
ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $76,673 to it, the largest being Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ($25,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $76,673 in grants to ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE?
Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds St Johns Retirement Village →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing