Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE

ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $51,673 to it, the largest being Regnar & Beverly Paulsen Foundation ($17,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$3.4M
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$52k
Grants received
$3.0M
Net assets
2/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($11M) Expenses 100 ($11M) Net assets 100 ($2.5M)2018 Revenue 100 ($11M) Expenses 98 ($10M) Net assets 113 ($2.9M)2019 Revenue 101 ($11M) Expenses 102 ($11M) Net assets 115 ($2.9M)2020 Revenue 105 ($11M) Expenses 103 ($11M) Net assets 132 ($3.3M)2021 Revenue 50 ($5.4M) Expenses 64 ($6.7M) Net assets 64 ($1.6M)2022 Revenue 20 ($2.1M) Expenses 35 ($3.7M) Net assets -1 ($-18556)2023 Revenue 12 ($1.3M) Expenses 9 ($902k) Net assets 61 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 2 ($260k) Expenses 8 ($826k) Net assets 38 ($968k)2025 Revenue 32 ($3.4M) Expenses 13 ($1.3M) Net assets 121 ($3.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (32)Expenses (13)Net assets (121)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 14% · 2023 53% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$180k
17
$334k
18
$35k
19
$425k
20
$1.3M
21
$1.6M
22
$439k
23
$565k
24
$2.1M
25
4.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income rose $9k → $20k.

4 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE.

34%
largest funder
73%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 67% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 75%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

51% of ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $26k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $26k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 30%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE?
ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $51,673 to it, the largest being Regnar & Beverly Paulsen Foundation ($17,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $51,673 in grants to ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE?
Regnar & Beverly Paulsen Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $17,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ST JOHNS RETIREMENT VILLAGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing