Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Constance Dundas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$370k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$837kPhilanthropy$730kEducation$470kArts & Culture$330kHousing & Shelter$305kHuman Services$275kReligion$60kFood & Nutrition$40k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$60,000
VCU-MCV FOUNDATION$45,000
CHANCO ON THE JAMES$30,000
JACKSON-FEILD HOMES$30,000
THE HEALTH WAGON INC$30,000
ST ANDREWS SCHOOL$30,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE$30,000
RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
THE MIAMI FOUNDATION$25,000
CHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC$25,000
FAITH MISSION HOME$10,000
THE READ CENTER$7,500
VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF HISTORY$7,500
CROSSOVER HEALTH MINISTRY$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $565k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%FAITH MISSION HOME: $10k → 8%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 24%FAITH MISSION HOME: $5k → 8%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 24%FAITH MISSION HOME: $5k → 8%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $40k → 22%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 24%FAITH MISSION HOME: $5k → 8%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 22%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 24%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 22%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 22%JACKSON-FEILD HOMES: $30k → 22%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $33k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $33k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $25k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $20k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Constance Dundas Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Constance Dundas Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 14 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$2.2M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+17%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $367k · revenue +67%
  • JF
    JACKSON FEILD HOMES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +27%
  • SA
    St Andrew's School
    9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHANCO ON THE JAMES EPISCOPAL DIOCE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • ER
    EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
2
Richmond Residential Services Inc

Richmond residential services strives to provide person-centered care for individuals with diverse abilities and support needs, facilitating choice, growth and community participation

Human Services
3
Goodwin House Incorporated

The mission of goodwin house incorporated ("ghi") is to support, honor and uplift the lives of older adults and the people who care for them through a faith-based, nonprofit organization affiliated with the episcopal church.

Human Services
4
Virginia Lutheran Homes Inc

Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.

—
5
Fellowship Village

Committed to the quality of life...unwaivering in achieving excellence. fellowships mission is to be the regions best community-based care facility in every aspect of the services we provide

Human Services
6
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
7
Episcopal Group Homes Inc

We provide quality residential services to persons with developmental disabilities, creating for them a supportive and challenging environment and the opportunity to develop skills essential to functioning as members of a community.…

Human Services
8
Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.

Human Services
9
The Virginia Home

The Virginia Home provides compassionate and professional residential care to adult Virginians with irreversible physical disabilities, ensuring that their lifelong comfort and security will never be compromised, regardless of the ability…

Health
10
Christian Church Homes

Cch builds and manages quality affordable housing in caring communities.

—
11
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
12
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elderhomes Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Good Shepherd Episcopal School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHANCO ON THE JAMES INC: $315,000 · OtherCHANCO ON THE JAMES INCCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC: $165,000 · OtherCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS I…ST MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherST MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLVCU-MCV FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherVCU-MCV FOUNDATIONCHANCO ON THE JAMES EPISCOPAL DIOCE: $50,000 · OtherCHANCO ON THE JAMES EPISCOPAL …RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $40,000 · Other+5 more: $60,000 · Other+5 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $465,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION IN…THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $265,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INCJACKSON FEILD HOMES: $280,000 · Human ServicesJACKSON FEILD HOMESGOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $250,000 · Human ServicesGOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGEFAITH MISSION HOME INC: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $367,000 · HealthST MARYS HEAL…RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $235,000 · Housing & ShelterRICHMOND ME…ELDERHOMES CORPORATION: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterELDERHOMES …St Andrew's School: $265,000 · EducationSt Andrew'…+1 more: $5,000 · Education
Other$810,000Philanthropy$730,000Human Services$565,000Health$367,000Housing & Shelter$305,000Education$270,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $465,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $367,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetJACKSON FEILD HOMES: $280,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSt Andrew's School: $265,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $265,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $250,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetRICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $235,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC: $165,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetELDERHOMES CORPORATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH MISSION HOME INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetREADING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY PLANET INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd Episcopal School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON FEILD HOMES ↗
  • Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHOMES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAITH MISSION HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds READING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds DAILY PLANET INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Episcopal School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Harriett B West Foundation · Lind Lawrence Foundation · United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Herndon Foundation · The Titmus Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Constance Dundas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Constance Dundas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Constance Dundas Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Constance Dundas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Constance Dundas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph