Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harriett B West Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$650k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$1.0MHealth$788kHousing & Shelter$355kHuman Services$353kEducation$335kArts & Culture$285kFood & Nutrition$160kEnvironment$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $215k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RICHMON$165,000
VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER$50,000
ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$35,000
RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$30,000
ELK HILL FARMINC$30,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE$30,000
BON SECOURS HEALTH CARE FDN$30,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF METRO RICHMOND$25,000
WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION$25,000
LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDENS$25,000
CHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS$25,000
JACKSON-FEILD BEHAVIORAL HLTH SVCS$25,000
VIRGINIA MUSEEUM OF HISTORY CULTURE$20,000
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA$20,000
CHANCO ON THE JAMES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $320k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $30k → 9%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE: $25k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$2.5M
$40k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $205k · revenue +276%
  • GN
    GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +11%
  • LG
    LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD McDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • VM
    VIRGINIA MUSEUM FOR HISTORY CULTURE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
2
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
3
Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia Inc

Home of va ensures equal access to housing opportunities by building individual capacity, ensuring compliance with fair housing laws, and promoting effective public policy to advance housing justice.

Housing & Shelter
4
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
5
Virginia Lutheran Homes Inc

Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.

6
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
7
Habitat for Humanity of Northern Va

Habitat for humanity of northern virginia brings our community together to build decent, affordable houses - and hope - for people in need. habitat provides a "hand up" to home ownership through sweat equity, donor generosity, volunteer…

8
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

9
Goodwin House Incorporated

The mission of goodwin house incorporated ("ghi") is to support, honor and uplift the lives of older adults and the people who care for them through a faith-based, nonprofit organization affiliated with the episcopal church.

Human Services
10
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
11
Columbia County Community Healthcare Consortium Inc

The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.

Health
12
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER — $300,000 · OtherVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTERBON SECOURS HEALTH CARE FDN — $180,000 · OtherBON SECOURS HEALTH CARE FDNTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RICHMON — $180,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RICHMONJACKSON-FEILD BEHAVIORAL HLTH SVCS — $150,000 · OtherJACKSON-FEILD BEHAVIORAL HLTH SVCSBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF METRO RICHMOND — $145,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF METRO RICHMONDRICHMOND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $140,000 · OtherRICHMOND HABITAT FOR HUMANITYELK HILL FARM INC — $130,000 · OtherELK HILL FARM INCCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC — $125,000 · OtherCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INCSCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA — $110,000 · OtherSCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIACAMP CHANCO ON THE JAMES — $95,000 · OtherCAMP CHANCO ON THE JAMES+10 more — $215,000 · Other+10 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $855,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL — $205,000 · EducationANNA JULIA…St Andrew's School — $130,000 · EducationSt Andrew'…GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE — $175,000 · Human ServicesGOOD NEIG…WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION — $145,000 · Human ServicesWESTMINST…BETTER HOUSING COALITION — $105,000 · Housing & ShelterCARITAS — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterRICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $150,000 · EnvironmentVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $85,000 · Arts & CultureART 180 Inc — $15,000 · Arts & CultureFREE CLINIC OF POWHATAN INC — $7,500 · HealthGoochlandCares — $7,500 · Health
Other$1,770,000Philanthropy$855,000Education$335,000Human Services$320,000Housing & Shelter$195,000Environment$150,000Arts & Culture$100,000Health$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $855,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL — $205,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE — $175,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $150,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION — $145,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSt Andrew's School — $130,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetELK HILL FARM INC — $130,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC — $125,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetBETTER HOUSING COALITION — $105,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $85,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCARITAS — $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetART 180 Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDAILY PLANET INCORPORATED — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE
  • Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds St Andrew's School
  • Who funds ELK HILL FARM INC
  • Who funds CHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC
  • Who funds BETTER HOUSING COALITION
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CARITAS
  • Who funds RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds ART 180 Inc
  • Who funds HEALTH BRIGADE
  • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF POWHATAN INC
  • Who funds DAILY PLANET INCORPORATED
  • Who funds GoochlandCares

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA31.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Herndon Foundation · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · Annabella R Jenkins Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harriett B West Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harriett B West Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harriett B West Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph