Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Collinson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$539k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$508k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$843kEducation$581kHealth$428kInternational$330kRecreation & Sports$288kCommunity Improvement$90kEnvironment$90kYouth Development$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $250k+1 grant · $508k
$16,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$399k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Duke University$508,000
PRINCE DANCE Institute$16,000
Women in DSO$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%USA CRICKET: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
NV
IN
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
48

Total granted

$2.0M
$833k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+30%

Still filing today

64%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHealthAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $443k · revenue +26%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $305k · revenue +29%
  • DT
    DESTINATIONS & TRAVEL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $300k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • MC
    Mana Christian Church
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
  • AH
    AAU HOOP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • AA
    AMATEUR ATHLETIC UNION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
2
National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics

The national association of intercollegiate athletics (naia)'s mission is to promote the education and development of students through intercollegiate athletics participation.

—
3
United States Baseball Federation Inc

To foster the growth of amateur baseball in the united states and to organize national and international baseball competitions.

—
4
Usa Artistic Swimming

Appointed as the governing body by the us olympic committee, our mission is to provide leadership and resources for the promotion growth of synchronized swimming and to achieve competitive excellence at all levels and to develop broad…

—
5
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education
8
National Sporting Goods Association

Nsga supports its members' efforts to grow their business and advocates on their behalf by offering the following: 1) resources for recruiting, training, and development; 2) valuable publications & communications; 3) education and…

—
9
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
10
Usa Team Handball

To develop, promote, educate, and grow the sport of team handball at all levels in the united states and to enable united states athletes to achieve sustained competitive excellence to win medals in international and olympic competition.

Recreation & Sports
11
National Basketball Players Association

The national basketball players association (nbpa) serves to protect and advance the rights of our players.

—
12
American Athletic Conference

The american conference's mission is to provide students with the highest quality education and level of competition. working together with a collective strength and spirit, our universities are committed to our students' health and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usa Football Inc; the most unlike its peers is Adam Michael Rosen Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
28/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Duke University: $508,000 · OtherDuke UniversityCAMPUS CHURCH: $463,000 · OtherCAMPUS CHURCHDESTINATIONS & TRAVEL FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherDESTINATIONS & TRAVEL FOUNDATIONMana Christian Church: $200,000 · OtherMana Christian ChurchAAU HOOP FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherAMATEUR ATHLETIC UNION FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherCARBON FREE HAWAI'I INC: $90,000 · Other+36 more: $368,950 · Other+36 moreHAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $443,000 · EducationHAWAII PREPARATORY …GREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $113,000 · EducationGREATER ATLANTA CHR…+2 more: $15,000 · EducationTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $305,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST…315 PROJECT INC: $143,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $63,430 · HealthQUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $50,000 · HealthMoment Foundation: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL COALITION OF BLACK MEETING PROFESSIONALS INC: $60,000 · Community ImprovementUSA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL GAY BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA HOCKEY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH AMERICAN GAY AMATEUR ATHLETIC ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA BADMINTON: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsUnited States Fencing Association: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA SOFTBALL INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsAMATEUR SPORTS ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA FOOTBALL INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA WATER SKI & WAKE SPORTS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,129,950Education$571,000Public Safety & Disaster$305,000Religion$143,000Health$123,430Community Improvement$60,000Recreation & Sports$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $443,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $305,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDESTINATIONS & TRAVEL FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 11% of budget315 PROJECT INC: $143,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetGREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $113,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $63,430 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION OF BLACK MEETING PROFESSIONALS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetQUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVENTS INDUSTRY COUNCIL: $30,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNASHVILLE INNER CITY MINISTRY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN CHEERLEADERS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMUSIC CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF POLICE CHAPLAINS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUSA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNATIONAL GAY BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUSA HOCKEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA Cricket: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGIA AGAPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN GAY AMATEUR ATHLETIC ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMoment Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUSA BADMINTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetADAM MICHAEL ROSEN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUnited States Fencing Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA SOFTBALL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUSA FOOTBALL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA WATER SKI & WAKE SPORTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Olympic and Paralympic CommitteeCO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Collinson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Collinson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Usa Water Ski & Wake Sports Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Collinson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph