Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Clementine Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Philanthropy$31kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$9kYouth Development$8kHealth$4kEducation$4kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$552
Median grant
4
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROANLD MCDONALD HOUSE$9,550
INFANT CRISIS SVC$6,200
PIVOT$2,000
ARTS COUNCIL OKLAHOMA CITY$1,778
UCO FOUNDATION$1,250
MONTE CASSINO SCHOOL$1,000
OKLAHOMA CITY BALLET$1,000
IMPACT OKLAHOMA$925
DONORS CHOOSEORG$552
VARIETY CARE$500
NAMI OKLAHOMA$250
CHILDRENS HEALTH FOUNDATION$250
CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH$250
REGIONAL FOOD BANK$250
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INFANT CRISIS SVC: $6k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SVC: $3k → 16%PIVOT: $3k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SVC: $2k → 16%PIVOT: $2k → 16%PIVOT: $2k → 16%PIVOT: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SVC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$91k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$91k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+93%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    IMPACT OKLAHOMA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +16%
  • INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $12k · revenue +66%
  • PIVOT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAMEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +93%
  • CO
    CITY OF NICHOLS HILLS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

4
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
6
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
7
Oklahoma Policy Inc

Oklahoma policy advances equitable and fiscally responsible policies that expand opportunity for all oklahomans through nonpartisan research, analysis, and advocacy.

Civil Rights
8
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

9
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
10
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
11
Dean Mcgee Eye Institute

The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.

Health
12
Oklahoma Community Service Commission Inc

The mission of the oklahoma community service commission is to engage oklahomans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service which supports americorps programs in oklahoma communities. services may include assisting with…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Chance to Change Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Washington University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMPACT OKLAHOMA INC — $30,922 · Human ServicesIMPACT OKLAHOMA INCINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $12,187 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INCPIVOT INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCROANLD MCDONALD HOUSE — $29,747 · OtherROANLD MCDONALD HOUSEOKLAHOMA CITY BALLET — $3,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY BALLETCITY OF NICHOLS HILLS — $2,750 · OtherCITY OF NICHOLS HILLS+10 more — $5,327 · Other+10 moreOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $3,000 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY — $2,978 · Arts & CultureNAMI OKLAHOMA INC — $1,750 · HealthVariety Care Inc — $500 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $250 · HealthDONORSCHOOSEORG — $1,552 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100 · EducationREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $250 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$50,609Other$40,824Arts & Culture$5,978Health$2,500Education$1,652Food & Nutrition$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIMPACT OKLAHOMA INC — $30,922 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $12,187 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPIVOT INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY — $2,978 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI OKLAHOMA INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $1,552 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVariety Care Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPACT OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC
  • Who funds PIVOT INC
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY
  • Who funds NAMI OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG
  • Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds Variety Care Inc
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peyton Family FoundationOK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peyton Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Gabcare Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Clementine Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Variety Care Inc7% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Clementine Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Clementine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph