Skip to content

· Public charity

The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$10MHealth$4.8MRecreation & Sports$675kCommunity Improvement$406kArts & Culture$309kPhilanthropy$150kHuman Services$100kFood & Nutrition$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $5,992,897, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,115,203 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $122,306 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $236k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $735k
  • $250k+1 grant · $5.0M
$26,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$5,000,000
FOREST HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$200,000
CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI$175,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$155,000
CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE$100,000
THE ABERCRUMBIE GROUP$55,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI$50,000
WYOMING CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$40,000
GIVING VOICE FOUNDATION$30,000
WEST CHESTER LIBERTY CHAMBER ALLIANCE$28,375
SAM HUBBARD FOUNDATION$26,000
REDI CINCINNATI LLC$25,000
BT RISE LLC$20,000
CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION$16,000
MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 16%YWCA GREATER CINCINNATI: $13k → 16%YWCA GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%YWCA GREATER CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 33 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
9

Total granted

$12M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+12%

Still filing today

52%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +33%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $805k · revenue +204%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $153k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • DC
    DEPAUL CRISTO REY CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $48k
  • CI
    Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts
    one grant, 2024 · $29k · revenue 0%
  • MK
    Melanoma Know More
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
2
Uc Health Foundation

Uc health foundation is the fundraising entity of the uc healthcare system. our mission is to support groundbreaking work that takes place across the academic health center to provide the best in prevention, treatment, education and…

Health
3
University of Cincinnati Physicians Inc

Ucp organizes, manages, and delivers the clinical activities and professional medical services of the faculty of the university of cincinnati college of medicine.

—
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
6
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
7
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
10
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
11
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—
12
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is West Chester Chamber Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

lakota local school district: $1,459,625 · Otherlakota local school districtOAK HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,396,331 · OtherOAK HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTPRINCETON CITY SCHOOLS: $921,049 · OtherPRINCETON CITY SCHOOLSWYOMING CITY SCHOOLS: $709,098 · OtherWYOMING CITY SCHOOLSFOREST HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $600,000 · OtherFOREST HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTMADEIRA CITY SCHOOLS: $395,721 · OtherMADEIRA CITY SCHOOLSCINCINNATI SPORTS MALL: $306,533 · OtherTHE ABERCRUMBIE GROUP: $260,000 · Other+17 more: $1,062,605 · Other+17 moreXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $5,000,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITYAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,398,750 · HealthAmerican Heart Association In…CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $1,300,000 · HealthCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH…CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $805,000 · HealthCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INCBEACON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $521,638 · HealthBEACON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH &…THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $158,028 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $152,500 · Health+6 more: $145,000 · HealthCINCINNATI UNITED SOCCER: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsCINCINNATI MARLINS INC: $27,833 · Recreation & SportsUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $150,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $10,800 · PhilanthropySOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL: $70,000 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $30,272 · Human ServicesSam Hubbard Foundation: $41,000 · Youth Development
Other$7,110,962Education$5,000,000Health$4,480,916Recreation & Sports$177,833Philanthropy$160,800Human Services$100,272Youth Development$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $5,000,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,398,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $1,300,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $805,000 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetBEACON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $521,638 over 4y, 63% of budgetTHE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $158,028 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $152,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI UNITED SOCCER: $150,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CINCINNATI SOCCER CLUB INC: $127,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWest Chester Chamber Alliance: $84,652 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGIVING VOICE FOUNDATION: $62,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER: $60,912 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSam Hubbard Foundation: $41,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $30,272 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $28,975 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCINCINNATI MARLINS INC: $27,833 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky African American Chamber of Co: $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMelanoma Know More: $19,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $10,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI UNITED SOCCER ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CINCINNATI SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds West Chester Chamber Alliance ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds GIVING VOICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER ↗
  • Who funds Sam Hubbard Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MARLINS INC ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky African American Chamber of Co ↗
  • Who funds Melanoma Know More ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH22.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Children's Hospital Medical Center · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Uc Healthcare System · Healthpath Foundation of Ohio · St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio · Trihealth Inc · Neediest Kids of All · Bethesda Inc · Interact for Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Christ Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Christ Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christ Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph