· Public charity
Bethesda Inc
To be a leader in contributing to the improvement of health/well-being in the cincinnati community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $135k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+10 grants · $13M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRIHEALTH INC | $8,116,667 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $1,105,100 |
| BEST POINT BEHAVORIAL HEALTH | $650,000 |
| YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $635,000 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO | $625,100 |
| WOMEN HELPING WOMEN | $500,500 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY | $500,000 |
| THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE | $387,463 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $375,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC | $260,719 |
| GROUNDWORK OHIO ORGANIZATION | $206,250 |
| JAMAA HEALTH | $150,000 |
| GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $143,750 |
| EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS | $138,375 |
| NYNI INC | $110,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $570k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITRIHEALTH INC8× · 2017–2024 · $58M · revenue +44%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +36%
- TGTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO2× · 2021–2022 · $1.9M · revenue +22%
Funded once
- FIFERNSIDE INC A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDRENone grant, 2023 · $1.3M · revenue -61% · 67% of their budget
- TPTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORPone grant, 2021 · $413k · revenue -34%
- HOHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATEDone grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
The cincnnati health network (chn) is a grantee for the health care for the homeless program in the greater cincinnati area and operates as a federally qualified health center. the chn is also the ryan white part c grantee and provides…
Circle Health fights for equity by healing, teaching, and inspiring individuals and families to reach their full potential.
Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.
To provide pathways for growth, achievement, and lifelong success.
Provide high quality integrated healthcare services to consumers and agencies primarily in tuscarawas and carroll counties.
To improve the health of those we serve.
We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.
Mission: PreventionFIRST! implements best practice strategies to reduce the risk of behavioral health disorders. Vision: All communities apply prevention strategies in every stage of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Knowledgeworks Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRIHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
- Who funds WOMEN HELPING WOMEN ↗
- Who funds Children's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc ↗
- Who funds FERNSIDE INC A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK OHIO ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC ↗
- Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
- Who funds INTERACT FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE ACCESS NOW ↗
- Who funds Every Child Succeeds ↗
- Who funds RefugeeConnect ↗
- Who funds Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST STEP HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Rosemary's Babies Co ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Knowledgeworks Foundation ↗
- Who funds Community Mental Health Centers of Warren County Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Interact for Health · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Millstone Fund · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Healthpath Foundation of Ohio · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bethesda Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.