· Public charity
The Christ Hospital
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $5,992,897 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,115,203 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $122,306 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $236k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $735k
- $250k+1 grant · $5.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| XAVIER UNIVERSITY | $5,000,000 |
| FOREST HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $200,000 |
| CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI | $175,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $155,000 |
| CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE | $100,000 |
| THE ABERCRUMBIE GROUP | $55,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $50,000 |
| WYOMING CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $40,000 |
| GIVING VOICE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| WEST CHESTER LIBERTY CHAMBER ALLIANCE | $28,375 |
| SAM HUBBARD FOUNDATION | $26,000 |
| REDI CINCINNATI LLC | $25,000 |
| BT RISE LLC | $20,000 |
| CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| METROPOLITAN CLUB CORPORATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +33%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2017–2022 · $153k · revenue +53%
- UWUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati3× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- DCDEPAUL CRISTO REY CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $48k
- CICincinnati Institute of Fine Artsone grant, 2024 · $29k · revenue 0%
- MKMelanoma Know Moreone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.
Ucp organizes, manages, and delivers the clinical activities and professional medical services of the faculty of the university of cincinnati college of medicine.
Uc health foundation is the fundraising entity of the uc healthcare system. our mission is to support groundbreaking work that takes place across the academic health center to provide the best in prevention, treatment, education and…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…
Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds BEACON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI UNITED SOCCER ↗
- Who funds GREATER CINCINNATI SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds West Chester Chamber Alliance ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GIVING VOICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds Sam Hubbard Foundation ↗
- Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MARLINS INC ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds The Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky African American Chamber of Co ↗
- Who funds Melanoma Know More ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Children's Hospital Medical Center · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Uc Healthcare System · Healthpath Foundation of Ohio · St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio · Trihealth Inc · Neediest Kids of All · Bethesda Inc · Interact for Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Christ Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.