Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chesapeake Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.5MReligion$948kHuman Services$827kEducation$730kInternational$624kFood & Nutrition$381kHealth$263kArts & Culture$190kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $800k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$30,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$250,000
CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$100,000
CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD$75,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$75,000
FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA$75,000
JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA$75,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE NY$50,000
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF ST AUGUSTINE$50,000
CITYMEALS ON WHEELS$50,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI$50,000
ST STEPHEN MARTYR CHURCH$30,000
MANHATTAN UNIVERSITY$30,000
SAINTS PETER AND PAUL CHURCH$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $25k → 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%MID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WI
NY
MA
SD
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of The Chesapeake Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Chesapeake Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 28 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
50

Total granted

$4.2M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+9%

Still filing today

46%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Manhattan University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +2%
  • SO
    Sisters of St Joseph Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +35%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT
    3× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BASILICA OF ST PATRICK'S OLD CATHEDRAL
    one grant, 2024 · $160k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -42%
  • SA
    ST ANSELM RC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
7
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
8
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
9
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
12
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Equine Partnership Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1,395,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA: $375,000 · OtherJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USACATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $250,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USACATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE NY: $200,000 · OtherTHE BASILICA OF ST PATRICK'S OLD CATHEDRAL: $160,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · Other+56 more: $1,528,100 · Other+56 moreCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $265,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC M…FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP: $190,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $49,000 · InternationalAMERICARES…Sea Turtle Conservancy: $20,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalManhattan University: $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT: $65,000 · EducationFordham University: $45,000 · EducationCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $135,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $45,000 · Food & NutritionTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more: $16,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA: $150,000 · PhilanthropyALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $75,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $25,000 · Human ServicesMID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$4,208,100International$529,000Education$360,000Food & Nutrition$263,000Philanthropy$150,000Health$100,000Human Services$48,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $265,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University: $250,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP: $190,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $135,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSisters of St Joseph Inc: $95,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWAYSIDE HOUSE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $49,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUINE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthshore Food Bank: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOCONUT GROVE CRISIS FOOD PANTRY: $9,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of Alaska: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Manhattan University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Sisters of St Joseph Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAYSIDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX12.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chesapeake Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chesapeake Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy: 1% of income from government
  • Wayside House Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chesapeake’s filings →

More from the funding graph