Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chambers Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$210kHuman Services$201kHousing & Shelter$128kYouth Development$73kEducation$65kHealth$50kInternational$40kCommunity Improvement$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $133k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL$25,000
BETHEL COMMUNITY OUTREACH$15,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$12,500
Freedom Farm Inc$10,000
Urban Ministry$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TUSCALOOSA$10,000
COOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES$10,000
WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK$10,000
Embrace Alabama Kids$10,000
LOVE INC OF TUSCALOOSA$10,000
MPower Ministries$10,000
EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL$7,500
SAV A LIFE TUSCALOOSA$7,500
Mission Increase$7,500
CHURCH OF GOD OF PROPHECY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BIG OAK RANCH: $10k → 13%M POWER MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%Embrace Alabama Kids: $10k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $10k → 13%M-Power Ministries: $10k → 16%Embrace Alabama Kids: $10k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $5k → 13%M POWER MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%Embrace Alabama Kids: $5k → 18%MPower Ministries: $10k → 16%Urban Ministry: $10k → 16%Urban Ministry: $8k → 16%Urban Ministry: $8k → 16%EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL: $15k → 17%EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL: $10k → 17%EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL: $8k → 17%EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL: $8k → 17%EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$788k · 19 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$788k
$5k

Still filing today

79%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BETHEL COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +24%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +196%
  • CD
    COOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF GOD OF PROPHECY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Community Ministries Inc

Providing food & shelter to the homeless and transitioning the homeless toward permanent independence in housing.

Human Services
2
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
3
Christian Care

Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge

Housing & Shelter
4
Christian Mission Centers Inc

The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.

—
5
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
6
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
7
His Hope Ministries Inc

Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.

Housing & Shelter
8
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
9
United Methodist Children's Home

To provide quality compassionate behavioral healthcare services to children and families of arkansas through a comprehensive continuum of programs which include residential treatment center care, therapeutic group home care, emergency…

Human Services
10
Community Ministries Inc Community Kitchen

Providing free lunches to the hungry, sheltering the homeless during inclement weather, and case management for those seeking financial assistance. services are offered to those in the paducah, kentucky area.

Religion
11
Born Again Ministries

To provide or connect low -income or ex-offenders affordable houses who wouldn't otherwise have the opportunity to have a bighter future

Health
12
House of Hope Ministries

Provide a home for children who have been abandoned and abused.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Methodist Children's Home; the most unlike its peers is Bethel Community Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL: $110,000 · OtherTUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWLHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA: $65,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSACOOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC: $62,500 · OtherCOOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INCYOUTH FOR CHRIST: $57,500 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRISTWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $52,500 · OtherWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INCLOVE INC OF TUSCALOOSA: $50,000 · OtherLOVE INC OF TUSCALOOSASAV-A-Life Of Tuscaloosa Inc: $32,500 · OtherSAV-A-Life Of Tuscaloosa IncMission Increase: $22,500 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherEAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC: $47,230 · Human ServicesEAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOU…CARING DAYS INC: $40,750 · Human ServicesCARING DAYS INCM-POWER Ministries: $40,000 · Human ServicesM-POWER MinistriesBIG OAK RANCH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INCUrban Ministry Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesUrban Ministry IncUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $25,000 · Human ServicesUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S H…BETHEL COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $65,000 · Community ImprovementBETHEL CO…FREEDOM FARM INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCrisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $17,500 · HealthAIM HIGH ACADEMY INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$472,500Human Services$202,980Community Improvement$65,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Health$17,500Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHEL COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $65,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA: $65,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC: $62,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $52,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC: $47,230 over 5y, 15% of budgetCARING DAYS INC: $40,750 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetM-POWER Ministries: $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSAV-A-Life Of Tuscaloosa Inc: $32,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Ministry Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM FARM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCrisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $17,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAIM HIGH ACADEMY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETHEL COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST TUSCALOOSA COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING DAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds M-POWER Ministries ↗
  • Who funds SAV-A-Life Of Tuscaloosa Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Urban Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AIM HIGH ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3 · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chambers Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chambers Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Chambers Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Chambers Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chambers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph