Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$495k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.4MReligion$901kHuman Services$591kFood & Nutrition$272kYouth Development$210kHousing & Shelter$205kEducation$180kPhilanthropy$155kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $205k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CIRCLE RANCH$87,500
COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL$67,423
THE MISSION OF HOPE$50,000
COUNSELING MINISTRY PROFESSIONALS$40,000
OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION$35,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC$30,000
BACKYARD BLESSINGS$25,000
FREEDOM FARM$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
ESG FOUNDATION SPECIAL CAMPS$15,000
HERE TO SERVE$15,000
HOPE'S CHOICE$15,000
FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$15,000
HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $797k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%KING'S HOME: $25k → 7%THE CIRCLE RANCH: $88k → 13%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 18%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 20%THE CIRCLE RANCH: $3k → 13%LOVELADY CENTER: $20k → 16%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $8k → 18%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 20%LOVELADY CENTER: $10k → 16%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 20%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $29k → 20%CARING DAYS: $20k → 17%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 20%CARING DAYS: $20k → 17%CARING DAYS: $5k → 17%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 20%CARING DAYS: $5k → 17%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 20%FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 20%HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC: $16k → 17%HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC: $15k → 17%HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC: $11k → 17%HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC: $8k → 17%HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA: $120k → 17%HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA: $105k → 17%TUSCALOOSA'S ONE PLACE: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA: $19k → 17%HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA: $10k → 17%EAGLES WINGS: $50k → 17%EAGLES WINGS: $40k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 41 repeat orgs$601k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
29

Total granted

$3.3M
$568k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+50%

Still filing today

61%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $260k · revenue +78%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $254k · revenue +48%
  • FW
    FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDRENS HO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $181k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MONTEVALLO
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TC
    TUSCALOOSA COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
2
Christian Mission Centers Inc

The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.

3
Lighthouse of Tallapoosa County in

Rehabilitation facility for alcoholics

Health
4
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
5
Hospice of Nw Alabama Inc

The hospice of northwest alabama's primary purpose is to provide health care for terminally ill patients. this care primarily consists of counseling for the patients and their families and nursing care provided in the patient's home and/or…

Human Services
6
Carlorene House Inc

To provide total care for the low-income, mentally ill, and homeless population.

Housing & Shelter
7
Alabama Affordable Housing Association Inc

To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.

Community Improvement
8
Children's Refuge Ministries

Dedicated to the promotion and protection of the general health and well being of children in chickasaw county, ms and surrounding areas by providing food, clothing, and other support for children and families in need.

Food & Nutrition
9
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

11
North Al Christian Childrens Home

Provides foster care for children placed in home by family court lauderdale county

12
Homes of Hope for Children Inc

To serve children in crisis throughout mississippi by providing strong, christian homes to every child who lives on campus while ensuring that each child is loved unconditionally and has their physical, spiritual, and emotional needs met.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tuscaloosa Safe Centerinc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%9%<5yr15%15%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr14%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%14%<5yr15%11%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr14%16%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
15%
840/5,701

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
26/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE MISSION OF HOPE — $428,500 · OtherTHE MISSION OF HOPEIndividual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY — $167,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient — $120,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC — $102,423 · OtherBOYS SCOUNTS OF AMERICAN - BLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL — $84,615 · OtherHOPES CHOICE — $80,225 · Other+45 more — $1,100,250 · Other+45 moreHOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC — $253,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF WEST ALABAM…FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDRENS HO — $181,400 · Human ServicesFREE WILL BAPTIST CHIL…THE CIRCLE RANCH INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE CIRCLE RANCH INCEAGLES' WINGS INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesEAGLES' WINGS INCHOPE FOR WOMEN LLC — $54,500 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR WOMEN LLCCARING DAYS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCARING DAYS INCFREEDOM RAIN INC — $30,000 · Human Services+3 more — $47,500 · Human Services+3 moreOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $260,000 · HealthOCHSNER CLI…COUNSELING MINISTRY PROFESSIONAL INC — $112,000 · HealthCOUNSELING …THOMASVILLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthTHOMASVILLE…+1 more — $7,000 · HealthDCH Foundation Inc — $198,000 · EducationSamford University — $54,810 · EducationTHE RESTORATION ACADEMY — $30,000 · EducationBACKYARD BLESSINGS — $122,500 · Food & NutritionCITY OF LIGHTS — $95,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 · ReligionTUSCALOOSA CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,258,513Human Services$796,900Health$429,000Education$282,810Food & Nutrition$122,500Religion$110,000Philanthropy$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $260,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC — $253,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetDCH Foundation Inc — $198,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetFREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDRENS HO — $181,400 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBACKYARD BLESSINGS — $122,500 over 7y, 11% of budgetCOUNSELING MINISTRY PROFESSIONAL INC — $112,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC — $102,423 over 5y, 12% of budgetCITY OF LIGHTS — $95,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE CIRCLE RANCH INC — $90,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetEAGLES' WINGS INC — $90,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHOPES CHOICE — $80,225 over 6y, 19% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $60,000 over 3y, 63% of budgetTUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC — $60,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetFREEDOM FARM INC — $55,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetSamford University — $54,810 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR WOMEN LLC — $54,500 over 5y, 12% of budgetTUSCALOOSA COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCARING DAYS INC — $50,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetTUSCALOOSA CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetTHE ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetTHE RESTORATION ACADEMY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFREEDOM RAIN INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKings Home Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHERE TO SERVE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetWALKER COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST AL — $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJoy Like Anna Foundation Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTUSCALOOSA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds DCH Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDRENS HO
  • Who funds BACKYARD BLESSINGS
  • Who funds COUNSELING MINISTRY PROFESSIONAL INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC
  • Who funds CITY OF LIGHTS
  • Who funds THE CIRCLE RANCH INC
  • Who funds EAGLES' WINGS INC
  • Who funds HOPES CHOICE
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds TUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC
  • Who funds FREEDOM FARM INC
  • Who funds Samford University
  • Who funds HOPE FOR WOMEN LLC
  • Who funds TUSCALOOSA COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CARING DAYS INC
  • Who funds THOMASVILLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TUSCALOOSA CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE RESTORATION ACADEMY
  • Who funds FREEDOM RAIN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL33.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Reese Phifer Jr Memorial Attn Susan Cork · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Nick's Kids Foundation Inc · The James I Harrison Family Foundation · Walker Area Community Foundation Inc · McAbee Family Foundation · Holle Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Chambers Charitable Foundation Inc · Cecile C Craig Charitable Test Trust · Ernest G & Cecil B Williams Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3?

    Find your warmest path to Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph