· Private foundation
The Cestone Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $450k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER | $200,000 |
| NYU LANGONE | $100,000 |
| NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND | $50,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA | $50,000 |
| MOUNT SAINT DOMINIC ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| EXPLORING THE ARTS INC | $35,000 |
| THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION | $25,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $25,000 |
| GREAT SWAMP WATERSHED ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC | $25,000 |
| NEW YORK CITY BALLET | $20,000 |
| MANOR COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | $20,000 |
| SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC | $15,000 |
| DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER4× · 2020–2024 · $411k · revenue +22%
- TCTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $106k · revenue +51%
- GSGreat Swamp Watershed Association4× · 2021–2024 · $95k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- TRTEAM RUBICON INCone grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +18%
- FOFriends of Firefighters Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +121%
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To provide enhanced opportunities for all citizens of bergen and passaic counties with intellectual and other disabilities and their families through advocacy, community education, direct services, and customized supports to help these…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eden Autism Services Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EXPLORING THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Great Swamp Watershed Association ↗
- Who funds MANOR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS 2 SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN AUTISM SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds Capital Harmony Works Inc ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds SAGE ELDERCARE ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF THE MORRIS AREA ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds Community Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds DRUEDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds ADLER APHASIA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Friends of Firefighters Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Hunterdon County Inc ↗
- Who funds PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Hunterdon Art Museum ↗
- Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds VIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Provident Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Kearnybank Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Cestone Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Hope Inc — 41% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Adler Aphasia Center — 12% of income from government
- Family Promise of Warren County Inc — 9% of income from government
- Hunterdon Art Museum — 9% of income from government
- Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Sage Eldercare — 1% of income from government
- Students 2 Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Scarc Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cestone Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Cestone Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.