Skip to content

Delaware · Private foundation

The Caswell Jin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$284k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
60%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$27,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 7
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$6.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 60% of the organizations The Caswell Jin Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 16% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$284k50%
FY20245$270k60%
FY20233$400k33%
FY20222$300k0%
FY20213$350k33%
FY20204$240k25%
FY20197$200k57%
FY20183$90k33%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.3MHealth$615kEducation$150kInternational$135kPhilanthropy$50kArts & Culture$45kFood & Nutrition$25kEnvironment$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Caswell Jin Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCivic News Company: $1,274,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetHealthright 360: $480,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPledges Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRebuild Local News: $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetComplex Disorders Alliance Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest of Silicon Valley: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPartners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Nonprofit News: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDollar For: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFamilies of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Dba Cure Sma: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCityside Journalism Initiative: $14,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLydian Accelerator: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBowman School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Caswell Jin Foundation with peer funders

About The Caswell Jin Foundation

How much does The Caswell Jin Foundation give?
The Caswell Jin Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $284,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 7 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Caswell Jin Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (55%), Health (27%), Education (6%).
Who are The Caswell Jin Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Civic News Company ($1.3M), Healthright 360 ($480k), Pledges Inc ($100k).
Does The Caswell Jin Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Caswell Jin Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Caswell Jin Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is The Caswell Jin Foundation based?
The Caswell Jin Foundation is based in DE.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Caswell Jin’s filings →

More from the funding graph