Skip to content
The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$606k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MArts & Culture$740kHealth$640kHousing & Shelter$421kEducation$350kYouth Development$283kPublic Benefit$250kReligion$230kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $423k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF LAKE CITY$50,000
DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC$50,000
MILWAUKEE ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY$45,000
MILWAUKEE ROAD HERITAGE CENTER$45,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
ST JOHNS PREP SCHOOL$30,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$25,000
OUR LADY OF PEACE$25,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA$25,000
OPEN DOOR$20,000
GMCC MINNESOTA FOODSHARE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$17,000
HIAWATHA HOMES FOUNDATION$15,000
KEYSTONE COMMUNITY SERVICES$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $511k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS: $20k → 11%DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $8k → 12%FAMILY MEANS: $8k → 6%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS: $20k → 11%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $10k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 12%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS: $20k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 12%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $6k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $6k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $6k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $5k → 11%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $10k → 14%FAMILY MEANS: $5k → 6%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $10k → 14%FAMILY MEANS: $5k → 6%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%FAMILY MEANS: $5k → 6%FAMILY MEANS: $5k → 6%FAMILYMEANS: $5k → 6%FAMILY MEANS: $5k → 6%CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA INC: $15k → 11%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $7k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $7k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $5k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $5k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $5k → 14%FAITHS LODGE: $10k → 11%SOLID GROUND: $15k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $15k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $15k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $15k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $15k → 14%FAITH'S LODGE: $8k → 11%SOLID GROUND: $15k → 14%FAITH'S LODGE: $5k → 11%FAITH'S LODGE: $5k → 11%GUADALUPE ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM: $10k → 14%CHANGE INC: $10k → 14%CHANGE INC: $10k → 14%CHANGE INC: $10k → 14%CHANGE INC: $10k → 14%CHANGE INC: $10k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $25k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $20k → 14%CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
SD
OH
CA
VA
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 78 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
14

Total granted

$4.9M
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+7%

Still filing today

59%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +182%
  • GR
    GREAT RIVER HOMES INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +91%
  • SG
    Solid Ground
    7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +381%

Funded once

  • AP
    ADA PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS PREP
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • MF
    MINNESOTA FOODSHARE - GMCC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
2
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
3
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
4
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
5
Minnesota Housing Partnership

Minnesota housing partnership (mhp) expands housing and community development opportunity by leading collaborative work to promote systems change and grow develoopment capacity.

—
6
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
7
Fraser

Fraser is a minnesota nonprofit with a nationally renowned reputation, serving children and adults with special needs. this multi-faceted healthcare, education, and housing human service organization provides direct services, information,…

Human Services
8
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
9
Able Inc

A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…

Human Services
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
The Dwelling Place

The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.

Human Services
12
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ampersand Families; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/56
Grantees still filing
38/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $525,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMILWAUKEE ROAD HERITAGE CENTER: $400,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE ROAD HERITAGE CENTERCITY OF LAKE CITY: $250,000 · OtherCITY OF LAKE CITYORDER OF ST BENEDICT INC: $150,000 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $140,000 · Other+62 more: $2,072,000 · Other+62 moreSolid Ground: $105,000 · Human ServicesSolid GroundGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $99,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MINNE…Development Foundation Inc: $90,000 · Human ServicesDevelopment F…OUR LADY OF PEACE: $70,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADY OF P…CHANGE INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesCHANGE INCAMPERSAND FAMILIES: $59,000 · Human ServicesAMPERSAND FAM…CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION: $53,000 · Human ServicesCHILD LOSS FO…FAMILYMEANS: $45,000 · Human ServicesFAMILYMEANSCAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA INC: $32,000 · Human Services+1 more: $18,000 · Human ServicesHIAWATHA HOMES FOUNDATION: $97,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $64,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INC: $39,000 · HealthMAJESTIC HILLS RANCH FOUNDATION: $37,000 · HealthALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $21,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $20,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $20,000 · HealthFamilyWise Services: $17,000 · HealthBLINDNESS-LEARNING IN NEW DIMENSIONS INC: $16,000 · Health+1 more: $7,000 · HealthJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $170,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE HOUSE OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $52,000 · Housing & ShelterEMMA NORTON SERVICES: $39,000 · Housing & ShelterMILWAUKEE ROAD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $245,000 · Arts & CultureHOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAKE CITY MUSIC BOOSTERS: $40,000 · EducationEAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $40,000 · Education
Other$3,537,000Human Services$641,000Health$368,000Housing & Shelter$261,000Arts & Culture$245,000Youth Development$102,000Education$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE ROAD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $245,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $170,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT RIVER HOMES INC: $115,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSolid Ground: $105,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetKeystone Community Services: $105,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $99,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetHIAWATHA HOMES FOUNDATION: $97,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetLearning Disabilities Association Inc: $74,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE DENTAL CLINIC: $70,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR: $70,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHANGE INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $70,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $64,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMPERSAND FAMILIES: $59,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD LOSS FOUNDATION: $53,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $52,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHERN STAR COUNCIL: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILYMEANS: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWILDERNESS INQUIRY INC: $44,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE CITY MUSIC BOOSTERS: $40,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetLA OPORTUNIDAD INC: $40,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetDAKOTA WOODLANDS: $40,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHAVEN HOUSING: $40,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $40,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetJOSEPHS COAT INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetEMMA NORTON SERVICES: $39,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC: $39,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMAJESTIC HILLS RANCH FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetCAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA INC: $32,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ARC MINNESOTA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $27,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $21,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMERRICK INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFamilyWise Services: $17,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLINDNESS-LEARNING IN NEW DIMENSIONS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget360 Communities: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetOUR SAVIOUR'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMobile Hope: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE PHOENIX RESIDENCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ROAD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVER HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Solid Ground ↗
  • Who funds Keystone Community Services ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds HIAWATHA HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Learning Disabilities Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE DENTAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR ↗
  • Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds AMPERSAND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF ST CROIX VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FAMILYMEANS ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE CITY MUSIC BOOSTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustThe Richard M Schulze…Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Minneapolis Found…Fred C and Katherine …Greater Twin Cities U…Mightycause Charitabl…Hardenbergh FoundationFr Bigelow FoundationAndersen Corporate Fo…Warren FoundationHugh J Andersen Found…
Otto Bremer TrustMN64.6× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Warren Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Neighborhood House Inc: 53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn?

Find your warmest path to The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home