· Private foundation
The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $423k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF LAKE CITY | $50,000 |
| DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| MILWAUKEE ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $45,000 |
| MILWAUKEE ROAD HERITAGE CENTER | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| ST JOHNS PREP SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| OUR LADY OF PEACE | $25,000 |
| JEREMIAH PROGRAM | $25,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA | $25,000 |
| GMCC MINNESOTA FOODSHARE | $20,000 |
| OPEN DOOR | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,000 |
| KEYSTONE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $15,000 |
| HIAWATHA HOMES FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $511k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JPJEREMIAH PROGRAM8× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +182%
- GRGREAT RIVER HOMES INC6× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +91%
- SGSolid Ground7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +381%
Funded once
- APADA PROJECTone grant, 2022 · $55k
- SJST JOHNS PREPone grant, 2022 · $30k
- MFMINNESOTA FOODSHARE - GMCCone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…
Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.
Minnesota housing partnership (mhp) expands housing and community development opportunity by leading collaborative work to promote systems change and grow develoopment capacity.
Fraser is a minnesota nonprofit with a nationally renowned reputation, serving children and adults with special needs. this multi-faceted healthcare, education, and housing human service organization provides direct services, information,…
Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.
A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ampersand Families and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILWAUKEE ROAD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground ↗
- Who funds Keystone Community Services ↗
- Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds HIAWATHA HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Learning Disabilities Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF PEACE ↗
- Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds HOPE DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
- Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
- Who funds AMPERSAND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF ST CROIX VALLEY ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILYMEANS ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗
- Who funds JOSEPHS COAT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Warren Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn?
Find your warmest path to The Casey Albert T Oneil Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.