Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Captiva Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$110kEducation$63kHealth$56kArts & Culture$24kHuman Services$20kCrime & Legal$18kInternational$17kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PETA FOUNDATION$20,000
BISON CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
ERIN'S FARM NFP$10,000
PARENTS FAMILY CIRCLE$10,000
CODE FOR LIFE USA INC$7,000
TALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC$7,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE$5,000
ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE$5,000
HEALTH AND EDUCATION ALTERNATIVE FOR TEENS (HEAT)$5,000
ORANGUTAN OUTREACH$5,000
SMILE TRAIN$5,000
THE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION$3,000
VIA$3,000
HOSPICE FOUNDATION$3,000
GRASSROOTS GARDENS WNY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%APOPO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
VA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 16 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$290k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+65%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ERIN'S FARM NFP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • TALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +68%
  • RI
    REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $18k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • IS
    ISWA SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMME
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AU
    APOPO US INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +447%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
International Animal Rescue Us Inc

The organization's vision is a world where humans and animals coexist in sustainable ecosystems. the organization focuses on conservation; habitat protection; promoting biodiversity and rescue, rehabilitation release and monitoring of…

Animals
10
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Code for Life Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Erin's Farm Nfp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PETA FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherPETA FOUNDATIONROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE: $23,000 · OtherROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTEPARENTS FAMILY CIRCLE: $20,000 · OtherPARENTS FAMILY CIRCLEVIA: $12,000 · OtherVIAISWA SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMME: $10,000 · OtherISWA SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMMEHEALTH AND EDUCATION ALTERNATIVE FOR TEENS (HEAT): $10,000 · OtherHEALTH AND EDUCATION ALTERNATIVE FOR TEENS (HEAT)SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER HEAT PROGRAM: $8,500 · OtherTHE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Other+11 more: $35,500 · Other+11 moreERIN'S FARM NFP INC: $50,000 · AnimalsERIN'S FARM NFP INCTHE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE KILHAM BEAR CEN…ORANGUTAN OUTREACH INC ATTN RICHARD ZIMMERMAN: $5,000 · AnimalsORANGUTAN OUTREACH …THE BISON CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $38,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BISON CHILDRE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM: $15,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS …+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $12,000 · EducationCODE FOR LIFE USA INC: $7,000 · EducationALLIANCE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationTALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureANSONIA MUSIC OUTREACH ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $17,500 · Civil RightsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · Environment
Other$167,000Animals$60,000Philanthropy$54,000Education$24,000Arts & Culture$23,500Civil Rights$17,500Environment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetERIN'S FARM NFP INC: $50,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetTHE BISON CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $38,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCODE FOR LIFE USA INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAPOPO US INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGUTAN OUTREACH INC ATTN RICHARD ZIMMERMAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALLIANCE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS SUPPORT GROUP OF CAPE COD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSONIA MUSIC OUTREACH ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAC ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY13.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Captiva Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Captiva Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • Aids Support Group of Cape Cod Inc: 33% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Captiva Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Captiva Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Captiva’s filings →

More from the funding graph