Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$389k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$804kYouth Development$739kArts & Culture$553kReligion$108kHuman Services$80kPublic Benefit$35kRecreation & Sports$27kEnvironment$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $263k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
$13,020
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A PLACE CALLED HOME$51,000
STRIVE$50,000
INNER-CITY ARTS$35,000
KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT$30,000
FRACTURED ATLAS$25,000
TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA$25,000
CENTER FOR LAND BASED LEARNING$25,000
SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE$20,000
GET LIT$15,000
ST CYRIL OF JERUSALEM SCHOOL$13,020
BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS ANGLERS$10,000
SCV SENIOR CENTER$10,000
SOOKE BOXING CLUB$10,000
READING PARTNERS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 82% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 18% that went abroad ($435k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 14%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 14%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 14%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 14%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 18% of all-years giving ($435k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$435k · 18 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 21 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$2.2M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+33%

Still filing today

48%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    A PLACE CALLED HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $395k · revenue +4%
  • IA
    INNER-CITY ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +44%
  • SF
    STRIVE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $216k · revenue +303%

Funded once

  • UF
    US FOUNDATION FOR THE SCHOOL OF CHI
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • K
    KCRW
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • HF
    HARTLEY FILM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth in Arts

Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…

Arts & Culture
2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
3
Starting Arts Inc

Starting arts was founded in 2002 with the mission to make arts education accessible to all students in san francisco bay area schools. we believe that in order to stimulate and educate students to reach their fullest potential the…

Youth Development
4
Venice Arts
Arts & Culture
5
Art Share Los Angeles

Promoting culturals arts in los angeles including education, gallery exhibits, artist living and work spaces theater, art and community festivals, artistic development and community outreach.

Arts & Culture
6
Los Angeles Performance Practice

As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…

Arts & Culture
7
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
8
California Institute of the Arts

Calarts is a multidisciplinary community of artists. our ongoing educational endeavor is grounded in openness, experimentation, critical engagement, and creative freedom. through artistic practice, we transform ourselves, each other, and…

Arts & Culture
9
Create Ca

Create CA advocates for high-quality arts education for all students by providing policy expertise and mobilizing a statewide network of advocates and allied partners.

—
10
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
11
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
12
Los Angeles Academy of Arts and Enterprise

To prepare students for leadership in the arts and business; where creativity, academic knowledge and financial literacy are essential for success. we are providing an education that integrates the four lenses of learning: academics, arts,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Create Now Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saturday Night Bath Concert Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A PLACE CALLED HOME: $395,375 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEUNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA: $245,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VICTORIAOPERATION PROGRESS STUDENT ASSISTAN: $172,000 · OtherOPERATION PROGRESS STUDENT ASSISTANTEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $107,500 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHOLOMU S FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIV OF VICT: $105,000 · OtherU S FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIV OF VICTTHE BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $72,500 · Other+17 more: $264,720 · Other+17 moreINNER-CITY ARTS: $325,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTSGET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC: $87,000 · Arts & CultureGET LIT - WORDS IGNIT…FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSTRIVE FOUNDATION: $216,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTRIVE FOUNDATIONKIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC: $130,000 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS IN THE SPOTL…JUJU FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUJU FOUNDATIONSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 · EducationCREATE NOW INC: $33,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $4,500 · EducationSanta Clarita Valley Committee On Aging: $32,500 · Human ServicesCenter for Land-Based Learning: $25,000 · Environment
Other$1,362,095Arts & Culture$452,000Youth Development$366,000Education$172,500Human Services$32,500Environment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $395,375 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $325,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSTRIVE FOUNDATION: $216,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetKIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC: $130,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetGET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC: $87,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCREATE NOW INC: $33,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSanta Clarita Valley Committee On Aging: $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUJU FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSATURDAY NIGHT BATH CONCERT FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF TEMECULA: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds STRIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aging ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Land-Based Learning ↗
  • Who funds JUJU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SATURDAY NIGHT BATH CONCERT FUND ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF TEMECULA ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management’s filings →

    More from the funding graph