· Private foundation
The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of THE CANET FOUNDATION CO GLOBAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $263k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A PLACE CALLED HOME | $51,000 |
| STRIVE | $50,000 |
| INNER-CITY ARTS | $35,000 |
| KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA | $25,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR LAND BASED LEARNING | $25,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS | $25,000 |
| SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| GET LIT | $15,000 |
| ST CYRIL OF JERUSALEM SCHOOL | $13,020 |
| SCV SENIOR CENTER | $10,000 |
| SOOKE BOXING CLUB | $10,000 |
| BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS ANGLERS | $10,000 |
| READING PARTNERS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 82% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 18% that went abroad ($435k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 18% of all-years giving ($435k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APA PLACE CALLED HOME8× · 2017–2024 · $395k · revenue +4%
- IAINNER-CITY ARTS8× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +44%
- SFSTRIVE FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $216k · revenue +303%
Funded once
- UFUS FOUNDATION FOR THE SCHOOL OF CHIone grant, 2017 · $35k
- KKCRWone grant, 2017 · $25k
- HFHARTLEY FILM FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…
Starting arts was founded in 2002 with the mission to make arts education accessible to all students in san francisco bay area schools. we believe that in order to stimulate and educate students to reach their fullest potential the…
Promoting culturals arts in los angeles including education, gallery exhibits, artist living and work spaces theater, art and community festivals, artistic development and community outreach.
As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…
Calarts is a multidisciplinary community of artists. our ongoing educational endeavor is grounded in openness, experimentation, critical engagement, and creative freedom. through artistic practice, we transform ourselves, each other, and…
Create CA advocates for high-quality arts education for all students by providing policy expertise and mobilizing a statewide network of advocates and allied partners.
Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
To prepare students for leadership in the arts and business; where creativity, academic knowledge and financial literacy are essential for success. we are providing an education that integrates the four lenses of learning: academics, arts,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Create Now Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saturday Night Bath Concert Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds STRIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds CREATE NOW INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aging ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Land-Based Learning ↗
- Who funds JUJU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SATURDAY NIGHT BATH CONCERT FUND ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF TEMECULA ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Canet Foundation Co Global Business Management Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.