Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Caller Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$102kPhilanthropy$61kFood & Nutrition$35kEducation$24kCrime & Legal$23kHealth$19kInternational$9kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$533k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHR ELIYAHU ACADEMY$10,000
MAGEN AM USA INC$10,000
UNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS$8,700
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHABAD OF THE BLUEGRASS$2,500
HOPE CENTER INC$2,500
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE - UNIVERSITY OF FL$1,800
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE BLUEGRASS$1,000
NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM INC$500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$250
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC$100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100
LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION$100
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $100 → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $100 → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $100 → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $100 → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $100 → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $100 → 15%LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 15%UNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS: $9k → 15%UNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS: $9k → 15%UNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS: $9k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
KY
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 86% of The Caller Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Caller Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 22 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$303k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+94%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthHousing & ShelterReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MAGEN AM USA INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +17%
  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +109%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • OA
    ORT AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • HI
    HIAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250 · revenue +94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
3
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
4
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
5
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
6
International Board of Jewish Missions Inc

To minister physically and spiritually to the jewish people.

Religion
7
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc

Since 1914, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) has acted on behalf of North America's Jewish communities and others to fulfill the principle that "kol Yisrael arevim zeh l'zeh" - all Jews are responsible for one…

International
8
Abrams Hebrew Academy

To encourage and challenge our students to become disciplined and creative life-long leaners, empowering them to fulfill their highest educational goals. to instill in our students a pride and understanding of their jewish heritage…

Religion
9
The Jewish Agency - American Section Inc

The jewish agency-american section, inc. (jaas) was organized to work with and in support of non profit organizations active in the fields of immigration and absorption in israel; youth care and training; teaching of hebrew and jewish…

Human Services
10
Adolph & Rose Levis Jewish Community Center Inc

The mission of the adolph & rose levis jewish community center is to strengthen jewish continuity by offering compelling opportunities for physical, spiritual, educational, cultural and social enrichment. the levis jcc creates a…

Human Services
11
New Jewish Narrative Inc

To support a strong and secure israel and to carry out public information activities on the middle east peace issues in the united states.

International
12
The Jerusalem Connection
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ort America Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Hope Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHR ELIYAHU ACADEMY: $67,500 · OtherOHR ELIYAHU ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY: $34,800 · OtherUNITED WAYIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMESIVTA BIRKAS YITZCHOK HIGH SCHOOL: $22,500 · OtherMESIVTA BIRKAS YITZCHOK HIGH SCHOOLCHABAD OF THE BLUEGRASS: $15,000 · OtherCHABAD OF THE BLUEGRASSHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE - UNIVERSITY OF FL: $12,600 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE - UNIVERSITY OF FL+7 more: $5,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $26,100 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,150 · Human Services+2 more: $754 · Human ServicesMAGEN AM USA INC: $22,500 · Crime & LegalTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc: $7,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,350 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $4,500 · ReligionBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #204 BLUEGRASS COUNCIL: $750 · Youth Development
Other$222,400Human Services$28,004Crime & Legal$22,500Housing & Shelter$17,500International$8,600Religion$4,500Youth Development$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $26,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAGEN AM USA INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $4,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #204 BLUEGRASS COUNCIL: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBABY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $154 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN AM USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #204 BLUEGRASS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BABY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Keeneland Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Caller Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Caller Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Caller Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph