Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Byrne Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$290kHealth$270kHuman Services$123kEducation$60kAnimals$56kRecreation & Sports$30kEnvironment$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAROLINA'S GOLF FOUNDATION$15,000
CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE$15,000
EXPLORIS SCHOOL$15,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED$15,000
CROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERI$10,000
HORSE BUDDY$5,000
WUNC$5,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$5,000
TROSA$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $10k → 8%THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $8k → 8%THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$811k · 19 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$811k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+30%

Still filing today

53%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CARYING PLACE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $280k · revenue ×16
  • TE
    THE EXPLORIS SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +17%
  • CF
    CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • HN
    HOLLYS NEST
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • CP
    CATHOLIC PARISH OUTREACH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • M
    MSKCC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
5
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
6
Rex Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

Health
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERI: $162,500 · OtherCROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERIYMCA: $75,000 · OtherYMCAHORSE BUDDY: $30,500 · OtherHORSE BUDDYTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $28,000 · OtherTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS I…TRANSITIONS LIFE CENTER: $17,500 · OtherCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+11 more: $88,000 · Other+11 moreTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $280,100 · Housing & ShelterTHE CARYING PLACE INCCHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 · Health+2 more: $4,000 · HealthTHE EXPLORIS SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $22,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesDucks Unlimited Inc: $25,000 · EnvironmentHOLLYS NEST: $15,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTIONS INC: $10,000 · AnimalsLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $250 · Religion
Other$416,500Housing & Shelter$280,100Health$69,000Education$60,000Human Services$27,500Environment$25,000Animals$25,000Religion$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $280,100 over 7y, 12% of budgetTHE EXPLORIS SCHOOL: $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $22,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTIONS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC ALERT FOUNDATION UNITED STATES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARY WOMAN'S CLUB: $2,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CARYING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPLORIS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYS NEST ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MEDIC ALERT FOUNDATION UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds CARY WOMAN'S CLUB ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Byrne Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Byrne Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Byrne Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Byrne Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Byrne’s filings →

    More from the funding graph