· Private foundation
The Brookside Fund Co Miller Ward Aziz an Accountancy Co
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of THE BROOKSIDE FUND CO MILLER WARD AZIZ AN ACCOUNTANCY CO’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| CLARE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,500 |
| KENYON COLLEGE PLAYWRIGHT PROGRAM | $9,000 |
| NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SC | $8,000 |
| CENTER THEATRE GROUP | $6,000 |
| UCSD FUND | $5,000 |
| FEAST | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| WESTSIDE FOOD BANK | $2,500 |
| HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE | $2,500 |
| GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE | $2,000 |
| VENICE FAMILY CLINIC | $2,000 |
| THE PEOPLE CONCERN | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCLAREMATRIX8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +76%
- FIFEAST Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +135%
- CCCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- ESEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORKone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -8%
- SSOJORNone grant, 2017 · $600
COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Established in 2011, our mission is to help transform the state's higher education system into an engine of economic opportunity that empowers all californians, particularly those from underserved communities, to achieve their full…
Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.
Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Calarts is a multidisciplinary community of artists. our ongoing educational endeavor is grounded in openness, experimentation, critical engagement, and creative freedom. through artistic practice, we transform ourselves, each other, and…
Central city neighborhood partners is a california nonprofit corporation that is committed to fostering economic development and creating systematic change by developing collaborative partnerships and linking resources to improve the…
Community development and social enterprise organization.
We believe childhood is extraordinary. crestview culitivates academic excellence by nurturing individual potential, empowering students to learn joyfully and discover their unique talents within our caring community that fosters belonging.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center Theatre Group of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Edible Schoolyard New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
- Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds FEAST Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD ART SCHOOL ENDOWMENT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF ↗
- Who funds THE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC PALISADES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Brookside Fund Co Miller Ward Aziz an Accountancy Co funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- American School at Hartford for the Deaf — 32% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.