Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brite Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$33kEducation$15kHuman Services$14kRecreation & Sports$11kArts & Culture$6kEnvironment$5kHousing & Shelter$5kAnimals$4k
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION$10,000
METROLINA INTERGROUP ASSOCIATION$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$3,602
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
2
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
3
Charlotte Medical Dental and Pharmaceutical Association
Health
4
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
5
Coastal Horizons Center Inc

To provide a continuum of professional services to promote healthier lives, stronger families, and safer communities.

Health
6
InReach

Dedicated to providing high quality residential and community services to individuals with developmental and other disabilities in Mecklenburg and surrounding counties.

Human Services
7
The Charlotte Center for the Humanities Inc

The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.

Human Services
8
Share Charlotte

SHARE Charlotte is building a better Charlotte by empowering nonprofits and helping people invest in their communities in ways that matter most to them.

Community Improvement
9
Charlotte Speech and Hearing Center Inc

Providing access to superior speech-language and hearing services that empower and transform lives.

Health
10
Charlotte Tennis Association

CTA provides a full range of tennis programs and activities for people of all ages, abilities and backgrounds and creates opportunities to enjoy the social, physical and health benefits provided by the sport of tennis.

—
11
Center for Prevention Services

To promote health and resilience through progressive approaches that integrate evidence-based substance use prevention programming, harm reduction, and multifaceted systems of care.

—
12
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlotte Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MECKLENBURG AQUATIC CLUB: $10,000 · OtherMECKLENBURG AQUATIC CLUBKinderMourn Inc: $10,000 · OtherKinderMourn IncA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC: $5,000 · OtherA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INCTHROUGH THE WEEK PRESCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherTHROUGH THE WEEK PRESCHOOLMETROLINA INTERGROUP ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · OtherMETROLINA INTERGROUP ASSOCIATION INCHUMANE SOCIETY: $3,602 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETYMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · OtherCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $13,000 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSIONBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency: $5,000 · HealthDilworth Center for Chemical Depen…CLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $10,000 · EducationCLASSROOM CE…The Childrens Theatre of Charlotte Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureWing Haven Foundation Inc DBA Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary: $5,000 · AnimalsYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$41,602Health$28,000Education$10,000Arts & Culture$6,000Animals$5,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMECKLENBURG AQUATIC CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKinderMourn Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Childrens Theatre of Charlotte Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWing Haven Foundation Inc DBA Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Dickson Foundation Inc · Albemarle Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brite Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brite Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brite Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Brite Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brite’s filings →

    More from the funding graph