Skip to content

· Public charity

The Bridge Fund

To assist people with basic and critical needs that are experiencing personal crises and support education needs in our local communities, particularly needs not met by other agencies.

$819k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$345kHousing & Shelter$320kHuman Services$265kEducation$146k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $183,354, the rows itemized in this filing. The $819,243 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $635,889 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$33,459
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAFE OF LIFE$56,270
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$49,875
FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC$33,459
EVA'S CLOSET$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$15,000
REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC$8,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Evas Closet: $35k → 11%EVA'S CLOSET: $21k → 11%Redlands Chrisian Migrant: $36k → 10%EVA'S CLOSET: $20k → 11%Redlands Chrisian Migrant: $32k → 10%Evas Foundation: $11k → 11%Redlands Chrisian Migrant: $10k → 10%Community Cooperative: $20k → 11%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC: $9k → 10%Evas Closet: $9k → 11%Redlands Chrisian Migrant: $8k → 10%Beacon of Hope: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+42%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CAFE OF LIFE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +130%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $146k · revenue +21%
  • EF
    Evas Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $96k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARTIN DE PORRES OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • BO
    BEACON OF HOPE PINE ISLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
All Faiths Food Bank Inc

Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
3
Bread of Refuge Inc

Bread of Refuge is a food pantry that distributes over 1600 banana boxes of food every month to families in need. We also feed 75-to-100 homeless people every week.

Human Services
4
Hope Helps Inc

To prevent and reduce hunger and homelessness in central florida by equipping individuals and families to become self-sufficient through housing, outreach, prevention, and education.

Human Services
5
Meals On Wheels Plus of Manatee Inc

The mission of meals on wheels plus of manatee, inc. is to assist individuals to live independently by providing nutrition and caring supportive services.

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
7
Boca Helping Hands Inc

Provide food, medical and financial assistance to meet basic human needs as well as education, job training and guidance to create self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
8
Bonner Community Food Center Inc

The mission of bonner community food center is to assist people in our community with supplemental foods in a time of personal crisis. vision: helping families help themselves. guiding principles: to provide food assistance to qualifying…

Human Services
9
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
10
Central Florida Haven of Hope Ministries Inc

Benevolence and food support for those in the community who are food insecure.

Health
11
Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada

We provide food, shelter, and comprehensive services and inspire our community through collaboration, recognizing that each person is created in the image and likeness of god, and that god's compassion transformations lives.

Human Services
12
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Cooperative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Evas Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $240,643 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCEvas Foundation Inc: $95,620 · Human ServicesEvas Foundation IncREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $86,214 · Human ServicesREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INCCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC+2 more: $15,750 · Human ServicesCAFE OF LIFE INC: $319,774 · Housing & ShelterCAFE OF LIFE INCTHE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $146,224 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR LEE…THE SALVATION ARMY: $67,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMEALS OF HOPE INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionST MARTIN DE PORRES OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $9,625 · Religion
Human Services$498,227Housing & Shelter$319,774Other$213,724Food & Nutrition$35,000Religion$9,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAFE OF LIFE INC: $319,774 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $240,643 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $146,224 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetEvas Foundation Inc: $95,620 over 5y, 17% of budgetREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $86,214 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS OF HOPE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST MARTIN DE PORRES OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $9,625 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEACON OF HOPE PINE ISLAND INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Lee County IncFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Lee County Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bridge Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bridge Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bridge Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Bridge Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bridge’s filings →

More from the funding graph