Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Breneman Jaech Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$454kYouth Development$230kHuman Services$70kEducation$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GARAGE A TEEN CAFE$30,000
TOWN HALL ASSOCIATION$25,000
HUMANITIES WASHINGTON$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$899k · 11 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$899k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+8%

Still filing today

91%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Garage A Teen Cafe
    5× · 2021–2025 · $160k · revenue +45%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    2× · 2019–2021 · $60k · revenue +121%
  • TH
    Town Hall Association
    4× · 2022–2025 · $58k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • NF
    NORTHWEST FILM FORUM
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Athenaeum

The Seattle Athenaeum connects a dynamic literary community through a curated book collection, diverse programming, and opportunities for engaging conversations and transformative ideas.

Education
2
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
3
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
4
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
5
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
6
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
7
Holocaust Center for Humanity

The Holocaust Center for Humanity teaches the lessons of the Holocaust, inspiring students of all ages to confront bigotry and indifference, promote human dignity, and take action.

—
8
Seattle JazzED

Through Jazz education that liberates and inspires, Seattle JazzED increase access in the music room, celebrates student expression, and builds lasting connection rooted in community.

Arts & Culture
9
The Writers Room

Writers Room provides emerging and established writers, working in any and all literary genres, with affordable and tranquil workspace in NYC.

Arts & Culture
10
Friends of the Seattle Public Library

The Friends of the Seattle Public Library's mission is to elevate the Library and inspire the love of reading in our communities.

Education
11
On the Boards

On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.

—
12
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanities Washington; the most unlike its peers is The Garage a Teen Cafe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RICHARD HUGO HOUSE: $236,100 · Arts & CultureRICHARD HUGO HOUSETown Hall Association: $57,500 · Arts & CultureTown Hall AssociationHEDGEBROOK: $35,000 · Arts & CultureHEDGEBROOKNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST FILM FORUMSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURESHUMANITIES WASHINGTON: $20,000 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $135,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Clarion West: $55,000 · OtherClarion WestST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherThe Garage A Teen Cafe: $160,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Garage A Teen C…FRIENDS OF YOUTH: $70,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $60,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$398,600Other$200,000Youth Development$160,000Health$70,000Human Services$60,000Education$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRICHARD HUGO HOUSE: $236,100 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetThe Garage A Teen Cafe: $160,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTown Hall Association: $57,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetClarion West: $55,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEDGEBROOK: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANITIES WASHINGTON: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RICHARD HUGO HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds The Garage A Teen Cafe ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Town Hall Association ↗
  • Who funds Clarion West ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEDGEBROOK ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST FILM FORUM ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITIES WASHINGTON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ArtsfundWA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Artsfund · Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Breneman Jaech Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Breneman Jaech Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Breneman Jaech Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Breneman Jaech Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Breneman Jaech’s filings →

    More from the funding graph