Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bradley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$31kReligion$24kEducation$21kHuman Services$12kPhilanthropy$9kCrime & Legal$5kCivil Rights$3kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$355k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND$6,500
FAMILY LEGACY MISSIONS$1,728
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$500
BEACON HILL CLASSICAL ACADEMY$500
Individual grant recipient$300
SPEAK UP FOR HOPE$250
THE CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING NETWORK$250
VENTURA UNION RESCUE MISSION$200
GOOD SHEPHERD COMM CHURCH$150
TRINITY LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL$150
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TALITA CUMI ORPHANAGE IN BOLIVIA: $500 → 9%TALITA CUMI ORPHANAGE IN BOLIVIA: $300 → 9%TALITA CUMI ORPHANAGE IN BOLIVIA: $300 → 9%TALITA CUMI ORPHANAGE IN BOLIVIA: $300 → 9%TALITA CUMI ORPHANAGE IN BOLIVIA: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97k · 25 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +118% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
15

Total granted

$97k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+12%

Still filing today

44%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BEACON HILL CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +137%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND
    4× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +120%
  • PF
    PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • RR
    REGIONAL RECLAIM MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -9%
  • RL
    Real Life Church of Simi Valley
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • BI
    BRING IT UP MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $300 · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

2
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
3
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

5
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
6
Angel Christian Television Trust Inc

Our mission is to go into all the world and preach the Gospel through all forms of media and broadcast. We are a Christian organization spreading the word of God to the ends of the earth.

Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Christians for Biblical Equality

See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…

9
For the Gospel Ministries

Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…

Religion
10
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
11
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
12
Connect the World

The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Illustra Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Cancer Support OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%34%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr13%9%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,948

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY LEGACY MISSIONS — $11,520 · OtherFAMILY LEGACY MISSIONSFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $8,500 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYIndividual grant recipient — $7,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROSSROADS CHURCH — $6,600 · OtherCROSSROADS CHURCHALL THINGS POSSIBLE MINISTRIES — $3,200 · OtherALL THINGS POSSIBLE MINISTRIESDISCOVERY CHURCH OF SIMI VALLEY — $3,200 · OtherDISCOVERY CHURCH OF SIMI VALLEYWith God All Things Are Possible — $2,200 · Other+24 more — $12,700 · Other+24 moreBEACON HILL CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC — $20,450 · EducationBEACON HILL CLASSICA…CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND — $12,300 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HUN…WORLD VISION INC — $1,768 · InternationalWORLD VISION I…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $9,000 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL RECLAIM MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,675 · ReligionILLUSTRA MEDIA — $1,600 · ReligionThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc — $1,250 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $250 · Religion+2 more — $225 · ReligionPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES — $4,625 · Crime & LegalPacific Justice Institute — $1,750 · Civil RightsAmericans United for Life Inc — $1,300 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $250 · Civil Rights
Other$54,970Education$20,450International$14,068Philanthropy$9,000Religion$7,000Crime & Legal$4,625Civil Rights$3,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEACON HILL CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC — $20,450 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND — $12,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES — $4,625 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWith God All Things Are Possible — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL RECLAIM MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $1,768 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Justice Institute — $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,675 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTALITA CUMI — $1,650 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetILLUSTRA MEDIA — $1,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmericans United for Life Inc — $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRING IT UP MEDIA INC — $300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFATHERS IN THE FIELD — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDr James Dobson Family Institute — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEACON HILL CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES
  • Who funds With God All Things Are Possible
  • Who funds REGIONAL RECLAIM MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds Pacific Justice Institute
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds TALITA CUMI
  • Who funds ILLUSTRA MEDIA
  • Who funds Americans United for Life Inc
  • Who funds The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc
  • Who funds BRING IT UP MEDIA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
  • Who funds FATHERS IN THE FIELD
  • Who funds ZOE INTERNATIONAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · God's Gift · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bradley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bradley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bradley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph