Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brad and Nancy Rosenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$616kArts & Culture$249kYouth Development$220kHealth$84kRecreation & Sports$50kAnimals$21kHuman Services$14kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $119k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$25,000
MISCELLANEOUS$19,375
HARMONY PROJECT$15,000
WORTHY BEYOND PURPOSE$15,000
GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$10,000
CEDARS SINAI$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$2,342
MOUNTAIN HUMANE$2,000
BEIT TESHUVA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $200 → 11%DREAM FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $200 → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN: $3k → 11%IMAGINE LA: $1k → 14%IMAGINE LA: $1k → 14%IMAGINE LA: $1k → 14%IMAGINE LA: $1k → 14%IMAGINE LA: $1k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 44 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
58

Total granted

$1.4M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+29%

Still filing today

57%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $372k · revenue +20%
  • GD
    Green Dot Public Schools
    7× · 2017–2024 · $102k · revenue +55%
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $88k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • CB
    CAMP BOB WALDORF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY OPERA
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • UP
    UNITED PARENTS
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
3
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
4
The Mirman School for Gifted Children

We cultivate the boundless potential of highly gifted children, nurture their passions and talents, and develop a diverse community of creative and constructive lifelong learners.

Education
5
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
8
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
9
Aim High for High School

To increase educational equity by providing joyful, enriching learning experiences for middle school students, aspiring teachers, and experienced educators.

Education
10
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
43/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $371,800 · EducationTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCGreen Dot Public Schools: $101,893 · EducationGreen Dot Public SchoolsNew York University: $75,000 · EducationNew York UniversityHarmony Project: $61,000 · EducationHarmony ProjectUCLA FOUNDATION: $50,600 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC: $36,300 · Education+4 more: $13,850 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISCELLANEOUS: $86,754 · OtherMISCELLANEOUSIndividual grant recipient: $38,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP BOB WALDORF FOUNDATION: $38,000 · OtherCAMP BOB WALDORF FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $28,635 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherSUN VALLEY OPERA: $20,000 · OtherUNITED PARENTS: $20,000 · Other+65 more: $116,304 · Other+65 moreJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $179,700 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH BIG BRO…Worthy Beyond Purpose Inc: $29,500 · Youth DevelopmentWorthy Beyond …+3 more: $7,250 · Youth DevelopmentSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $88,424 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $16,842 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $4,804 · Arts & CultureCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $41,000 · HealthTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthSAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $1,450 · HealthANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $8,734 · AnimalsImagine Los Angeles Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $400 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human Services
Education$710,443Other$523,318Youth Development$216,450Arts & Culture$125,070Health$57,450Animals$8,734Human Services$8,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $371,800 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $179,700 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $101,893 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $88,424 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNew York University: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $61,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $50,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC: $36,300 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWorthy Beyond Purpose Inc: $29,500 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $16,842 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Parents and Students: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $8,734 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING: $5,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetServing Orphans Worldwide Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $3,030 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeach Democracy: $2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $1,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $1,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLCREST COUNTRY CLUB: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENT REVOLUTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHETA CHI FRATERNITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRising Sun Center for Opportunity fka RISING SUN ENERGY CENTER: $609 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMELISSA'S HOUSE: $513 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPARK PROGRAM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $315 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILD RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $239 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Green Dot Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Worthy Beyond Purpose Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PARENTS ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds United Parents and Students ↗
  • Who funds THE CHASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING ↗
  • Who funds Imagine Los Angeles Inc ↗
  • Who funds Serving Orphans Worldwide Inc ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA25.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Weingart Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · Johnny Carson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · Hope Share Care Foundation Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brad and Nancy Rosenberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brad and Nancy Rosenberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Brad and Nancy Rosenberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Brad and Nancy Rosenberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brad and Nancy Rosenberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph